Contents

Trendelenburg SignEdit

The Trendelenburg sign is a clinical indicator used to assess the strength and function of the hip abductor muscles, most notably the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus. It is typically evaluated during a straightforward orthopedic or neurologic examination and can point toward disruption of the normal stabilization provided by these muscles during single-leg stance. The sign is named for Friedrich Trendelenburg, a 19th-century German surgeon who helped popularize its description as part of the physical exam in musculoskeletal disease. While not perfectly sensitive or specific for every hip or nerve problem, the sign remains a practical, low-cost clue in many settings, especially when combined with patient history and imaging Friedrich Trendelenburg.

The Trendelenburg sign is distinct from but related to the Trendelenburg gait, a compensatory walking pattern that can develop when hip abductor strength is compromised. In a positive Trendelenburg sign, the pelvis drops on the side opposite the leg that is bearing weight, reflecting the inability of the stance-side hip abductors to hold the pelvis level. Clinically, patients may also exhibit a trunk or torso tilt toward the stance leg as a compensatory mechanism. Understanding this distinction is important for accurate localization of pathology to the hip abductors, their innervation, or associated joint disease trendelenburg gait.

This article surveys the anatomy involved, how the sign is elicited and interpreted, common etiologies, contemporary diagnostic approaches, management strategies, and the debates surrounding its use in modern practice.

Anatomy and physiology

  • Primary hip abductors: gluteus medius and gluteus minimus. These muscles stabilize the pelvis in the coronal plane during single-leg stance and play a key role in gait and balance. Dysfunction can arise from injury, tendon pathology, or nerve disruption. See gluteus medius and gluteus minimus for more detail.
  • Innervation: the superior gluteal nerve, which carries motor supply to the hip abductors. Injury or neuropathy of this nerve is a classic cause of a positive sign. See superior gluteal nerve.
  • Pelvic mechanics: during single-leg stance, the pelvis on the non-stance side tends to be elevated by the abductors; weakness allows gravity to tilt the pelvis downward on the contralateral side. This biomechanical picture underpins the clinical observation of the sign.
  • Related anatomy: the pelvis and adjacent structures (including the sacroiliac region and hip joint) contribute to or complicate the presentation when deformities, alignment differences, or pathology alter normal mechanics. See pelvis and hip joint for context.

Clinical presentation and testing

  • Eliciting the sign: the patient is asked to stand on one leg (the stance leg) while observing the pelvis for level maintenance. In a typical presentation, the pelvis drops on the side opposite the stance leg (contralateral pelvis), indicating weakness of the stance-side hip abductors. The trunk may tilt toward the stance leg as a compensatory strategy to preserve balance.
  • Interpretation: a positive sign suggests weakness of the stance-side gluteus medius/minimus or dysfunction of the superior gluteal nerve, among other possibilities. It is not exclusively diagnostic of one disease but points clinicians toward a muscular or neural etiology affecting hip stabilization. See Trendelenburg sign for the term itself and related concepts.
  • Related tests: clinicians may assess hip abductor strength with resisted abduction or perform a Trendelenburg test as part of a broader musculoskeletal examination. Additional assessments, such as gait analysis or imaging, are often used to refine the diagnosis. See physical examination and gait for broader context.

Causes and differential diagnosis

  • Superior gluteal nerve injury or palsy: commonly from trauma, pelvic or hip surgery, injections, or neuropathic processes affecting the nerve supply to the hip abductors. See superior gluteal nerve.
  • Gluteus medius/minimus tendon pathology: tears or tendinopathy, particularly in older adults or athletes, can weaken the abductor mechanism.
  • Hip joint disease: osteoarthritis, developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), or other structural abnormalities can alter abductor function or load distribution, contributing to a positive sign. See hip osteoarthritis and Developmental dysplasia of the hip.
  • Pelvic obliquity or leg-length discrepancy: asymmetry may influence the appearance of the sign or complicate interpretation.
  • Neuromuscular and systemic conditions: certain conditions that reduce motor function or disrupt proximal hip stabilizers can manifest with signs resembling a Trendelenburg pattern, requiring careful differential diagnosis. See neurology and orthopedics for broader context.

Diagnosis and imaging

  • Clinical diagnosis: the Trendelenburg sign is one element of a broader physical examination aimed at characterizing hip stability and abductor strength.
  • Imaging and electrodiagnostic studies: MRI or ultrasound of the hip abductors can reveal tendon pathology or tear; MRI of the hip and pelvis may show joint disease or structural abnormalities. Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies can help evaluate the status of the superior gluteal nerve in selected cases. See MRI and electromyography.
  • Integrating findings: clinicians combine history, signs, and imaging to determine whether the primary issue is muscular weakness, nerve injury, or joint pathology, and to plan appropriate management. See diagnosis and imaging for general methods.

Management

  • Nonoperative care: focused physical therapy to strengthen the hip abductors, improve neuromuscular control, and optimize gait mechanics. Weight management and activity modification may be advised in certain hip joint conditions. See physical therapy and rehabilitation.
  • Surgical options: if there is a tendon tear, nerve injury with persistent weakness, or significant joint pathology, surgical interventions—such as tendon repair or transfer, nerve procedures, or arthroplasty—may be considered. See tendon repair and hip arthroplasty.
  • Rehabilitative emphasis: regardless of etiology, therapy often targets gradual strengthening, motor control, and functional training to restore pelvic stability during ambulation. See gait rehabilitation.

Controversies and debates

  • Reliability and clinical value: there is ongoing discussion about the sensitivity and specificity of the Trendelenburg sign, particularly in diverse patient populations (age, obesity, or compensatory gait strategies). Critics argue that a single sign can be imperfect, and modern practice often relies on a combination of signs, imaging, and functional testing.
  • Role in modern practice: some practitioners emphasize imaging and objective gait analysis for precise assessment, while others defend the continued usefulness of the sign as a quick, low-cost bedside clue that can guide further testing without over-reliance on expensive or invasive studies. From a cost-conscious, evidence-based perspective, maintaining proficiency in this simple exam remains valuable, but it should be integrated with other diagnostic tools.
  • Interpretive debates: the sign belongs to a family of clinical signs that require careful interpretation in the context of overall motor function, balance, and lower-limb pathology. Critics caution against over-attributing a positive sign to a single cause and advocate for comprehensive evaluation, including potential imaging or nerve studies when indicated. See clinical examination and gait analysis for related topics.
  • Societal and educational context: while some discussions around medical education stress modernizing curricula to incorporate advanced imaging and technology, supporters of traditional bedside signs argue that foundational clinical skills remain essential for rapid assessment, especially in resource-limited settings. See medical education for broader discussion.

See also