Contents

San Remo ManualEdit

The San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea is a widely cited, non-binding restatement of how traditional rules of international humanitarian law apply to naval warfare and maritime operations. It translates core principles of public international law into practical standards for blockades, sea control, interdiction, search and seizure, and the protection of civilians and civilian objects at sea. While not a treaty itself, the manual serves as an influential reference for national rules of engagement, the assess­ment of state practice, and the guidance navies and coast guards use when planning or conducting operations on and under the sea. Its influence extends to counter-piracy missions, maritime interceptions, and the legitimate use of force against hostile vessels, all within the framework of lawful conduct at sea.

Origins and Development

The manual originated from an effort to reconcile enduring concepts of the law of armed conflict with the realities of modern naval power and maritime security threats. Working groups assembled in San Remo brought together scholars, practitioners, and representatives from various states to produce a comprehensive guide that would be applicable to a wide range of maritime contexts, from conventional state-on-state hostilities to counter-piracy and counter-terrorism missions. It builds on the core commitments of International humanitarian law and the Law of armed conflict, and it references established treaties such as the Geneva Conventions and related instruments while aiming to reflect customary international law as it has developed at sea. The project also engages with ongoing developments in the Law of the Sea to address questions of navigation, blockade, and freedom of passage in areas of armed conflict.

The San Remo Manual is frequently cited as a practical synthesis rather than a binding instrument. States rely on it to interpret, align, or critique their own Rules of engagement and training curricula for naval forces, and it is often used in policy discussions about maritime security, humanitarian protection, and the responsibilities of belligerents and neutrals in sea warfare.

Scope and Core Provisions

  • Distinction and civilian protection: The manual emphasizes the obligation to distinguish between military objectives and civilians or civilian objects, a central tenet of Distinction (international humanitarian law) that seeks to minimize civilian harm during maritime operations. It also reiterates the protections afforded to civilians on ships and in ports under applicable International humanitarian law.

  • Proportionality and precautions: Attacks and interdictions at sea must be proportional to the military objective and must take feasible precautions to avoid or limit civilian casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure. This aligns with the broader proportionality principle found in the Law of armed conflict and related doctrines.

  • Blockades and naval interdiction: The manual discusses the legality and conduct of blockades, including the conditions under which a blockade may be implemented, maintained, and challenged by neutral states. It clarifies the criteria for lawful enforcement and the rights of neutrals in maritime traffic, consistent with principles found in Blockade (international law) doctrines and the Law of the Sea regime.

  • Neutral ships and freedom of navigation: It covers the status and treatment of neutral vessels, including the conditions under which neutrals may navigate, trade, or transport goods during armed conflict, and how belligerents may engage in lawful interdiction without infringing on neutral rights.

  • Capture and detention: The manual outlines the treatment and handling of vessels and crews captured during maritime operations, including the rights and protections afforded to prisoners and detainees under established IHL frameworks, as well as the responsibilities of the capturing state.

  • Searches at sea and seizures: It provides guidance on the legal basis and limits for searches and seizures on the high seas and in contiguous zones, balancing law enforcement interests with protections for crew, passengers, and rely on recognized standards for due process and humane treatment.

  • Environmental considerations and humanitarian concerns: The document reflects concerns about the environmental impact of armed conflict at sea and calls for measures to minimize ecological harm consistent with the broader normative framework of IHL and maritime safety.

  • Non-state actors and irregular warfare: The manual addresses scenarios involving non-state actors, such as pirate fleets or militant groups that operate from or against maritime targets, offering guidelines that aim to restrain violence while allowing effective responses to asymmetric threats. The framework seeks to prevent abuses of law while ensuring that states can pursue legitimate security objectives.

  • Safety at sea and rescue: It underscores the obligation to ensure safe passage and rescue for crew and passengers in distress, aligning with humanitarian norms and maritime safety standards that govern lifeboat operations, search and rescue obligations, and the protection of individuals in danger at sea.

Implementation and Influence

Navy ministries, ministries of defense, and international security bodies reference the San Remo Manual when drafting or revising rules of engagement, training materials, and incident-response protocols for maritime operations. It is commonly cited in debates over the legality of blockades, interdictions against suspected terrorists or piracy networks, and responses to violations of territorial seas or exclusive economic zones. Where national practice diverges from the manual, policy makers often explain those deviations in terms of sovereignty, security threats, or the exigencies of particular theaters, arguing that a robust maritime security regime can be pursued without abandoning humanitarian protections envisioned by IHL.

Supporters contend that the manual helps deter reckless or indiscriminate violence by codifying standards that promote discipline, accountability, and lawful behavior at sea. Critics, however, sometimes view the document as potentially constraining rapid or aggressive responses to grave threats, especially in situations where non-state actors employ civilian vessels, disguise weaponry, or exploit ambiguous legal thresholds to escape accountability. Proponents counter that a clear legal framework reduces the risk of miscalculation and civilian harm, and provides a stable basis for international cooperation in policing sea routes and combating illicit activity.

The San Remo Manual interacts with several other bodies of law and policy, including Public international law, International humanitarian law, and United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea-related regimes that govern navigation freedoms, jurisdiction, and the lawful use of force at sea. It informs doctrine used by navies in planning operations against piracy off regions such as the Horn of Africa and other high-risk maritime zones, and it contributes to contemporary discussions about the legal character of blockades in modern contingencies, including counter-terrorism missions carried out at sea.

Controversies and Debates

  • Security versus constraint: From a practical security perspective, some observers argue that the manual’s emphasis on distinction, proportionality, and precautions can slow a response to fast-moving threats and constrain counter-piracy or counter-terrorism operations. They assert that in certain theaters, rapid interdiction and the ability to neutralize threats decisively may be necessary to prevent civilian harm that could arise from delayed action. Critics of over-caution claim that the framework should allow for more flexible, well-justified use of force when immediate danger to life is present, while still upholding humanitarian protections.

  • Sovereignty and maritime power: Critics sometimes argue that a strong emphasis on international norms could be exploited by states seeking to justify more intrusive actions against commercial shipping or maritime operations that support security objectives. In this view, maintaining robust sovereignty and the freedom of states to secure sea lines of communication remains essential, and legal norms should enable, not impede, decisive action against threats.

  • Non-state threats and the line between combatants and civilians: The nature of warfare at sea has evolved with non-state actors and asymmetrical tactics. Debates persist about how strictly civilians and civilian objects are protected when non-state actors exploit civilian vessels or use civilian infrastructure for military purposes. The manual provides guidance, but states differ on how to apply it in contested environments, leading to ongoing discussions about thresholds for targeting and the scope of permissible interdiction.

  • Woke criticisms vs. traditional IHL interpretations: Some critics argue that modern humanitarian discourse imposes constraints that could limit national defense and the protection of civilian life. Proponents of the manual would argue that faithfulness to IHL and the safeguards for civilian life are essential to legitimate uses of force and long-term stability. Supporters contend that the normative frame helps prevent abuses, reduces the risk of escalation, and provides a stable international order—an outcome that is seen as favorable for security and economic resilience. Critics who dismiss humanitarian concerns as mere political correctness are often accused of mischaracterizing IHL as dull or impractical; supporters reply that security gains come from disciplined, lawful action rather than reckless force.

  • The role of customary law versus treaty law: Some states question how precisely the San Remo Manual translates customary IHL and treaty-based provisions into practical maritime rules. They argue that, while the manual is a valuable interpretive tool, it does not replace binding treaty regimes or customary norms that can evolve differently across regions. Advocates view the manual as a coherent, up-to-date synthesis that reflects prevailing state practice and helps harmonize national measures with international expectations.

  • Environmental and humanitarian tradeoffs: In contested waters, decisions about environmental protection, the treatment of fisheries, and the impact of blockades on civilian livelihoods can become controversial. Supporters hold that a principled approach to environmental protection complements security interests, while opponents worry about potential constraints that could widen if environmental considerations are allowed to unduly hinder legitimate maritime operations.

See also