Contents

Prefork MpmEdit

Prefork MPM is a hydraulic way of handling client connections inside the Apache HTTP Server that emphasizes simplicity and reliability through process-based isolation. It belongs to the family of Multi-Processing Modules (Multi-Processing Module) that determine how Apache allocates resources to requests. In the prefork model, a fixed pool of child processes is created at startup, and each process handles one connection at a time. This contrasts with threaded models, where a small number of worker threads share the same address space to serve many connections. Prefork has long been favored in environments where stability and compatibility with non-thread-safe software stacks are paramount.

The prefork approach tends to be easy to reason about. Since there are no threads within a process, there is a straightforward failure domain: if a process crashes, only the single connection it was handling is affected, and other workers keep serving. This makes debugging and maintenance more predictable in certain configurations. At the same time, the memory footprint of each process can aggregate quickly under load, because every concurrent connection requires its own process space. As a result, prefork is often described as simple and robust in smaller deployments or where libraries and modules do not ship thread-safe implementations.

In practice, administrators choose Prefork MPM when they run non-thread-safe modules such as legacy mod_php configurations or certain legacy extensions, where threading inside a single process could complicate stability. It is also common in legacy stacks or dedicated static-content services where maximizing compatibility takes priority over the highest possible connection throughput. The prefork model sits alongside other MPMs in the ecosystem, notably the Worker MPM and the Event MPM, which trade isolation for concurrency through threaded designs. Each approach has its own set of trade-offs and is suitable for different workload profiles.

Architectural characteristics

  • Process-based concurrency: Prefork uses a pre-forked set of child processes, each handling one client connection at a time. There is no threading inside a process, which simplifies compatibility with non-thread-safe modules and libraries. See Apache httpd and Prefork MPM for related architecture.
  • Static resource allocation: The number of concurrent connections is bounded by the size of the child pool, chosen through directives such as StartServers, MinSpareServers, and MaxSpareServers as well as the modern equivalent MaxRequestWorkers and ServerLimit.
  • Memory footprint: Each child process runs with its own memory space, so total memory usage grows roughly linearly with the number of concurrent connections. This makes prefork less scalable on memory-limited systems compared to threaded MPMs.
  • Compatibility with modules: Since there are no threads within a process, libraries that do not support multithreading can be used safely. This has made prefork a long-standing default in environments with mod_php and other non-thread-safe components. See mod_php for more context.
  • Simpler debugging and security posture: Process isolation can simplify debugging and can improve fault containment. Crashes tend to stay contained within a single worker process.

History and context

Prefork originated as the default MPM in early and mid-era Apache deployments, when thread safety across the broader ecosystem of modules was not guaranteed. As the web and module ecosystems evolved, threaded MPMs offered higher concurrency with lower per-request memory overhead. The introduction of the Worker MPM (threaded workers with multiple threads per process) and the Event MPM (an event-driven variant) provided alternatives that scale better on modern hardware and with dynamic content workloads.

Despite the advent of more scalable MPMs, prefork remains in use for certain workloads and distributions, particularly where stability and compatibility with legacy components are valued. Its persistence highlights a central tension in server design: the balance between straightforward, robust behavior and aggressive resource efficiency. See discussions around the evolution of Apache httpd MPMs and the trade-offs between safety, performance, and compatibility.

Use cases, tuning, and comparisons

  • Best-fit scenarios: Small to moderate traffic environments, deployments relying on non-thread-safe modules, or setups prioritizing predictability and isolation over peak concurrency. See StartServers and MinSpareServers for tuning basics.
  • Tuning considerations: Administrators configure the number of ready-to-serve processes to match expected load, mindful of the available memory per process and the sum total of processes. The modern equivalents ServerLimit and MaxRequestWorkers replace older naming in contemporary Apache configurations. When growth is expected, increasing ServerLimit and MaxRequestWorkers can allow higher concurrency, but at the cost of memory usage per process.
  • Comparisons to other MPMs: The Worker MPM and the Event MPM can deliver higher connections-per-second on memory-constrained hardware by sharing workload across threads or by event-driven models. These MPMs are often preferred for busy sites, dynamic content, or modern PHP via PHP-FPM or other fast CGI interfaces. See discussions comparing Event MPM and Worker MPM with Prefork MPM for workload-specific recommendations.
  • Compatibility guidance: If a site runs mod_php or other libraries that are not thread-safe, prefork remains a reliable option. For sites seeking lower memory footprint with dynamic content, exploring threaded MPMs alongside modern fast CGI implementations can yield better performance.

Security and reliability considerations

  • Process isolation provides containment: individual request handling happens in separate processes, which helps in fault containment and can simplify security auditing.
  • Stability versus density: The trade-off is between stability and the ability to serve a large number of concurrent connections. In high-traffic environments, the per-process memory cost can become a limiting factor, making threaded MPMs more attractive.
  • Compatibility implications: The requirement to support non-thread-safe modules makes prefork a practical choice in certain legacy stacks, though it may complicate deployments that rely on modern, highly concurrent web applications.

See also