Contents

Cc By NdEdit

CC BY-ND is a license in the Creative Commons family that gives broad permission to share a work while imposing two clear limits: you must attribute the creator, and you may not create derivatives. In practice, this means people can copy and redistribute the material in its original form, in any medium, including for commercial purposes, as long as the work is passed along without alteration and with proper credit. The license is identified as CC BY-ND and sits alongside other options in the licensing ecosystem that range from permissive to more restrictive.

The core idea behind this license is straightforward: it maximizes distribution and visibility for creators who want to reach audiences widely, without surrendering control over how the work is presented or altered. Proponents emphasize that attribution preserves the author’s identity and historical record, while the NoDerivatives constraint preserves the integrity of the original expression. This balance—openness paired with guardrails on modification—is a recurring theme in modern content licensing and intellectual property management.

What CC BY-ND does

  • What is allowed: You may share the work with anyone, anywhere, in any medium or format, provided you do not alter it. You can make copies, host it online, republish it in a magazine or on a website, or distribute it in a classroom setting, as long as the distribution is in its original form. You must give proper credit to the creator and include a link to the license. In legal terms, a distribution under CC BY-ND grants permission to use the work while preserving the author’s attribution and the NoDerivatives restriction. See how attribution works with Attribution and how licenses are structured with License.
  • What is not allowed: Any change, remix, adaptation, translation, or other derivative work is prohibited under this license. Even small edits, localization, or reformatting that produce a new version would fall outside the license’s permission. For a deeper look at the concept of changing a work, see Derivative work.

  • Scope of use: The license covers a wide range of creative content, including images, text, music not protected by other arrangements, and similar materials. It does not, by itself, govern software licenses or data sets, which typically use different licensing frameworks and norms. For a broader comparison of licensing options, see Creative Commons and Public domain.

  • Attribution requirements: The credit must be given in a way that identifies the author, the title, the source, and the license, along with a notice that the work is licensed under CC BY-ND. This keeps the creator visible and allows audiences to trace the provenance of the material. See Attribution for more detail.

  • Practical considerations for users: The ND aspect makes distribution predictable—the original work will arrive in the same form that the creator published it, which is valuable for publishers and institutions seeking consistency and brand integrity. It also means that platforms, educators, and businesses can reuse material without negotiating new derivative permissions, so long as they respect the no-derivatives rule.

How it interacts with other licenses and norms

  • Relationship to other CC licenses: CC BY (attribution only) and CC BY-SA (attribution-ShareAlike) encourage downstream modification and sharing under compatible terms, which can foster remix culture and collaborative projects. CC BY-ND sits on the more protective end of the spectrum, suitable for authors who want broad sharing but insist on preserving the original work’s form. See CC BY and CC BY-SA for contrast, and how Public domain and traditional Copyright interact with CC licensing.

  • Compatibility and re-use: If a work under CC BY-ND is embedded in a larger project, the project as a whole must still respect the ND terms for the copied material. Those who wish to incorporate the content into modified or derivative products would need permission from the rights holder or choose a license that permits derivatives. See discussions of License compatibility for more nuance.

  • Open access and education: Some educators and institutions prefer licenses that permit adaptation to accommodate accessibility needs (translation, captioning, format changes). Those needs are often addressed by using more permissive CC licenses (like CC BY) or by obtaining a separate permission from the rights holder for any adaptations. See Remix culture for broader debates about openness and reuse.

Applications, advantages, and limits

  • Who uses CC BY-ND: Visual reporters, photographers, and publishers who want to ensure that the published image or article remains faithful to the original presentation while still enabling broad redistribution. Journalistic outlets sometimes use ND licenses to protect brand and message fidelity when distributing excerpts or republished material. See Copyright and Derivative work for related ideas.

  • Benefits: The license is simple to explain and enforce. It preserves the creator’s voice, reduces the risk of misrepresentation through edits, and encourages wide sharing without surrendering messaging or aesthetic control. For institutions that want to circulate material quickly, CC BY-ND offers a clear, low-friction path to distribution.

  • Limitations: The prohibition on derivatives can hinder collaborative projects, translations, or accessibility improvements. It may limit the educational value of material in multilingual or multi-format contexts, where adaptations are often necessary to maximize learning. Critics argue that this reduces the potential for knowledge to be reshaped to fit local needs, while supporters insist that protection of the original work’s integrity justifies the restriction. See the debates in the next section for more on this point.

Controversies and debates

  • Remixed culture versus content integrity: Critics of strict licenses argue that open licenses should maximize re-use and adaptation to foster innovation and education. Proponents of CC BY-ND counter that preserving a creator’s original expression protects against misrepresentation, brand damage, or deliberate mischaracterizations of a work’s intent. This tension mirrors broader debates about the balance between openness and control in intellectual property.

  • Education, accessibility, and equity: Some argue that ND licenses hinder accessibility improvements (e.g., translations, formatting changes, or adaptive technologies) that could extend a work’s reach to diverse audiences. Proponents reply that other licenses (like CC BY) or separate permissions can address those needs, while ND ensures the creator’s presentation remains unchanged for audiences who rely on it as published.

  • Woke criticisms and defenders’ responses: Critics from the viewpoint of broader cultural openness sometimes characterize ND as a barrier to “democratizing knowledge.” Proponents argue that this critique misreads the trade-off: licenses represent voluntary agreements where creators grant broad rights but with clear conditions. The claim that ND is inherently anti-democratic is often seen as overstated, because the same licensing ecosystem includes more permissive options that explicitly encourage derivative works, remixing, and localization. In this framing, the controversy centers on preferences about how much control creators should retain versus how freely content should circulate; the practical takeaway is that a menu of licenses exists, and creators can choose the one that best aligns with their goals.

  • Legal enforceability and practical risk: While CC licenses are designed to be clear and legally robust, enforcement can vary by jurisdiction. Institutions that rely on CC BY-ND should maintain proper attribution and ensure distributions comply with the NoDerivatives constraint, or risk disputes over whether a given use qualifies as a derivative. See Copyright and Derivative work for context on how courts interpret modifications and licenses.

History and current status

  • genesis and evolution: CC BY-ND is part of the Creative Commons toolkit developed to simplify sharing while protecting authors’ rights. Since its introduction, it has been adopted across a range of media, including images, text, and multimedia, by creators who want to retain control over the presentation while enabling broad dissemination. For a broader look at the organization and its licensing framework, see Creative Commons.

  • contemporary use: In practice, CC BY-ND remains appealing to creators seeking to guard against edits that could alter messaging or branding, and to organizations that want to distribute content widely without entering into derivative licensing arrangements. The license sits alongside other CC licenses that offer different balances between openness and control, such as CC BY, CC BY-SA, and CC BY-NC.

See also