Rabbit Proof FenceEdit

The Rabbit-Proof Fence is a landmark feature of Western Australia, officially known as the State Barrier Fence. Built to protect prime pastoral lands from the ecological and economic threat posed by rabbits, the fence extended across the state and became a visible symbol of the reach of state policy into the lives of ordinary people. In the public imagination, the fence is inseparable from a larger story about Australian history: how government policy, property rights, and national identity intersected with the lives of Indigenous Australians. The 2002 film Rabbit-Proof Fence, directed by Phillip Noyce and drawn from Doris Pilkington Garimarra’s book Follow the Rabbit-Proof Fence, helped popularize a specific historical episode—the escape of three Indigenous girls from Moore River Settlement and their attempt to reach family lands by traveling along the barrier. That tale sits at the crossroads of rugged frontier policy and the human costs of past social programs, and it continues to shape debates about reconciliation, governance, and the proper scope of state action in Australia.

Historical background and construction - The barrier against rabbits emerged as a practical response to a new agricultural challenge: rabbits introduced to Australian ecosystems in the 19th century had become a persistent threat to grazing and cropping. The State Barrier Fence grew out of this policy pressure, with segments built and extended over decades to cover vast stretches of the continent. The goal was to reduce rabbit populations and protect farming livelihoods, while also delineating a more orderly frontier across Western Australia. The fence therefore functioned as both a pest-control measure and a symbol of the era’s belief in large-scale public works as a solution to social and economic problems. For more on the scale and geography of the project, see State Barrier Fence and Western Australia. - The fence’s scale is one of its most enduring features: thousands of kilometers across the arid and semi-arid interior, a physical manifestation of state capacity and resource allocation. It was never a perfect barrier—rabbits and other species sometimes breached sections, and maintenance required ongoing effort—but it remained a central element of policy throughout much of the 20th century. It also came to symbolize the broader reach of colonial-era land management practices into the lives and lands of Indigenous communities. See also Public policy and Land rights for related discussions of how large-scale policy decisions affected communities.

The policy of removal and the Stolen Generations - The mid-20th century Australian policy environment included programs that sought assimilation through family separation, especially of Indigenous children. Across the country, Indigenous families were affected in ways that many observers now view as unjust or paternalistic. The Stolen Generations is a common, widely cited reference for this period, describing the removal of Indigenous children from their families and communities under state auspices. Debates over these policies continue to shape national conversations about reconciliation, memory, and responsibility. See Stolen Generations for a broader framing and Australian history for how these policies developed over time. - From a governance perspective, supporters of former-era policies often argued that assimilation and child-welfare measures were necessary to protect children and promote social integration within a diverse country. Critics, including many Indigenous advocates and contemporary policy analysts, view these actions as coercive intrusions on family autonomy and cultural continuity. Contemporary debates frequently center on how best to acknowledge past harms while designing policies that promote opportunity, dignity, and self-determination within the rule of law. See also Apology to the Stolen Generations and Self-determination for related policy discussions.

The journey along the fence: Molly, Daisy, and Gracie - The film and the book on which it is based tell the story of three Indigenous girls who escaped Moore River Settlement, a government institution, and traveled along the rabbit-proof fence toward their homeland. Their journey has a humanizing quality that highlights issues of identity, family, and resilience in the face of state intervention. The narrative emphasizes the realities of life in settlements and the enduring pull of country and kin. Readers and viewers can consult Moore River Settlement and Doris Pilkington Garimarra for context about the sources behind the story, and Rabbit-Proof Fence (film) for a cinematic interpretation of these events.

Memory, film, and policy debates - The Rabbit-Proof Fence narrative sits at the intersection of memory, culture, and public policy. On the one hand, the story foregrounds personal courage and the physical and emotional geography of a country where a long fence intersected with long journeys back to country. On the other hand, it invites critique of how governments have treated Indigenous families and communities, the adequacy of past policies, and the adequacy of current efforts at reconciliation. Proponents of more conservative governance often stress the importance of rule of law, orderly public institutions, and practical measures to promote economic opportunity and community stability, while also recognizing the need for honest reckoning with historical injustices. See also Rule of law and Reconciliation for related policy conversations. - Critics of historical policy frameworks sometimes argue that arrangements should have prioritized autonomy, family preservation, and locally informed approaches rather than centralized assimilation programs. Supporters of reform counter that reforms must be pragmatic and durable—focusing on private initiative, education, economic development, and accountable government—while still acknowledging the moral weight of past actions. The conversation includes debates about the best path forward to improve outcomes for Indigenous communities, including land rights, education, health, and economic participation. See Land rights, Education in Australia, and Economic development for extended discussions.

The modern legacy - Today, the rabbit-proof fence remains a historical and cultural artifact. It is studied as part of Australia’s agricultural history, its environmental management, and its social memory. The policy history surrounding the fence—especially as it intersects with Indigenous policy—continues to inform debates about national identity, reconciliation, and constitutional recognition. Contemporary discussions often connect to broader movements for Indigenous self-determination within Australian political and legal structures, including conversations around the Uluru Statement from the Heart and constitutional reform. See Uluru Statement from the Heart and Constitution of Australia for related material. - The memory of the fence also interacts with ongoing discussions about how best to balance the legitimate interests of landholders, farmers, and communities with the rights and interests of Indigenous peoples. As with many large-scale public works, the legacy is complex: a symbol of state capability and a reminder of past coercive policies. See Property rights and Public policy for broader policy considerations involved in balancing competing interests.

Rightsta: The Right Way to Search and Wiki

Search - Wiki

Rabbit Proof FenceEdit

Your Feedback is Important