Contents

Put Call ParityEdit

Put-Call Parity is a foundational relationship in options pricing that ties together the prices of European call and put options with the same strike and maturity on the same underlying asset. In an idealized setting—frictionless markets, a single risk-free rate, and no advantage from trading costs or constraints—the prices must satisfy a precise symmetry. For non-dividend paying stocks, the classic form is C - P = S0 - Ke^{-rT}, where C is the price of a European call, P is the price of a European put, S0 is the current stock price, K is the strike, r is the risk-free rate, and T is the time to maturity. When a stock pays dividends, a dividend adjustment enters the parity, shifting the stock term to reflect the present value of expected payouts: C - P = S0 e^{-qT} - Ke^{-rT}, with q representing the dividend yield. These relationships underwrite synthetic positions and hedging strategies that are central to risk management and price discovery in equity markets. They also illuminate the connection to forward pricing, since the forward price F0 = S0 e^{(r−q)T} emerges as a natural ingredient in the replication arguments used to justify parity. See discussions of European option and Forward contract in the broader literature.

Foundations

  • What the parity relates

    • European call: a right to buy the underlying at strike K at time T. See European option.
    • European put: a right to sell the underlying at strike K at time T. See European option.
    • The underlying price today: S0. See Stock.
    • The discount factor: e^{-rT}, where r is the risk-free rate. See Risk-free rate.
    • The dividend adjustment if relevant: q is the continuous dividend yield; for discrete dividends, the logic uses the present value of expected payouts. See Dividend.

  • The basic no-arbitrage claim

    • The payoff of a combination consisting of a long call and a short put with the same K and T is S_T - K, i.e., the payoff of a forward contract to buy the stock at K. See Forward contract.
    • A simple replication is to hold the stock itself and finance the purchase by borrowing an amount K e^{-rT} today. The payoff of this stock-plus-loan portfolio is S_T - K, identical to the call–put combination’s payoff.
    • Therefore, in a frictionless market, the cost today must match: C - P = S0 - Ke^{-rT} (adjusted for dividends as noted above). See Arbitrage and Cost of carry.

  • An intuitive arbitrage check

    • If C - P deviates from S0 - Ke^{-rT}, a trader can construct a risk-free strategy by taking the two portfolios that share the same T payoff (one via options, the other via stock plus a loan) and profit from the price discrepancy.
    • In practice, such opportunities are extremely short-lived in liquid markets, as algorithmic traders and passive arbitrageurs quickly restore parity through trades that push prices back toward the no-arbitrage condition. See Arbitrage and Hedging.

Extensions and real-world considerations

  • Dividends and carry

    • For stocks with a known dividend yield q, the parity becomes C - P = S0 e^{-qT} - Ke^{-rT}. This reflects the idea that holding the stock yields payouts that reduce the attractiveness of a pure forward-like exposure created with options. See Dividend and Cost of carry.

  • American options and early exercise

    • The parity described above holds for European options, which can only be exercised at maturity. For American options, the possibility of exercising before expiry (notably for calls on dividend-paying stocks) can break the exact parity relationship. In practice, the parity becomes an approximate guide, with the issuer’s exercise policy and dividend timing creating gaps that traders monitor. See American option.

  • Transaction costs, liquidity, and funding

    • Real markets include bid-ask spreads, commissions, short-selling constraints, and funding costs that differ from the risk-free rate. These frictions mean that C - P may not equal S0 - Ke^{-rT exactly, but can be very close in highly liquid markets. The parity remains a powerful organizing principle for pricing and hedging, even if exact equality is an idealization. See Arbitrage and Liquidity (finance).

  • Discrete dividends and tax considerations

    • When dividends are paid discretely rather than continuously, or when tax treatment affects option and stock returns differently, traders adjust the replication arguments accordingly. The core insight—that a correctly constructed portfolio of options plus stock can replicate a forward-like payoff—still guides pricing, but the exact arithmetic must reflect the cash flows in the specific setting. See Dividend and Taxation.

  • Practical use in pricing and hedging

    • Traders use put–call parity as a consistency check: if observed option prices violate the parity condition by more than what would be expected from costs and frictions, it signals a potential mispricing to be exploited quickly. The parity also underpins the concept of synthetic forwards created with options, enabling flexible hedging when actual forward contracts or stocks are expensive, restricted, or impractical. See Hedging and Forward contract.

  • Warnings against overreliance on the ideal model

    • Critics emphasize that real markets are not frictionless and that models rely on assumptions such as continuous trading, lognormal returns, and constant rates. While these caveats matter, the parity remains a robust, intuitive benchmark for understanding the relationship between option prices and the underlying asset. Proponents stress that even if not exact in practice, the parity helps organize risk and informs trading strategies in a disciplined, market-based framework. See Model risk.

See also