Contents

Openoffice ImpressEdit

OpenOffice Impress is the presentation program of the Apache OpenOffice suite, a free and open-source office solution that has served schools, small businesses, and individual users for decades. Impress enables users to create, edit, and deliver slide-based presentations, with support for rich media, animations, and a suite-wide standard for documents. It runs on multiple platforms and relies on open standards to promote interoperability, lowering barriers to entry for organizations that want to avoid lock-in with proprietary software.

Impress sits alongside other components of the suite, such as a word processor, a spreadsheet, and a drawing module, all of which are designed to work together under a common interface and file format. The project emphasizes the ability to import and export presentations in a variety of formats, including the open standard OpenDocument Presentation format, while maintaining compatibility with popular proprietary formats used in the market. The result is a practical tool for users who value cost control, data portability, and independence from single-vendor ecosystems, without sacrificing essential presentation features.

Overview

  • Cross-platform availability across major desktop environments, with builds for Windows, Linux, and macOS environments, enabling broad adoption in diverse settings. OpenOffice Impress is designed to integrate with the broader office suite and its file formats, notably the OpenDocument Presentation format (ODP) and related documents.
  • File formats and compatibility: Impress natively uses the OpenDocument format for slides, while also offering import and export capabilities for proprietary formats such as Microsoft PowerPoint and other common presentation file types. This interoperability is central to its appeal in environments that must share materials with users on different platforms.
  • Presentation features: Impress provides standard slide-based authoring, slide masters, templates, transitions, and simple multimedia support. Users can insert text, images, charts, and multimedia, and deliver presentations with on-screen notes and presenter tools.
  • Scripting and automation: The software exposes automation interfaces (via the UNO API) that allow power users and developers to extend Impress’s capabilities, create macros, or integrate with other parts of the OpenOffice suite and external systems.
  • Community-based development: Impress is developed in a community-driven, volunteer- and institution-supported ecosystem that emphasizes openness, transparency, and user-driven improvements.

History

The lineage of Impress traces back to StarOffice, a proprietary office suite that gained a broad user base in corporate and educational markets. When Sun Microsystems acquired StarOffice, its software became the backbone of what would become OpenOffice.org, an open-source project that released a free alternative to the dominant proprietary office tools. After Sun was acquired by Oracle, concerns about governance and direction contributed to a fork in the community, ultimately leading to the establishment of The Apache Software Foundation’s stewardship of Apache OpenOffice, the project under which OpenOffice Impress continues to evolve alongside other components of the suite. In parallel, a separate fork of the original project led to the emergence of LibreOffice, maintained by The Document Foundation, which has driven much of the ongoing innovation in the open-source office space. See OpenOffice and LibreOffice for the broader context of this ecosystem.

Features and capabilities

  • Document formats and compatibility: Impress uses the OpenDocument for presentations, aligning with open standards that promote long-term access to data. It maintains interoperability with Microsoft Office formats to support exchange with users relying on other ecosystems.
  • User interface and productivity: The Impress editor supports a familiar slide-based workflow, with a range of templates, themes, and layout options. It offers slide masters for consistent formatting, along with basic animation and transition effects to enhance delivery without requiring external tools.
  • Media and interactivity: Presentations can incorporate images, charts, audio, and video, with simple mechanisms to control playback during a slide show. Presenter notes and timing features assist in delivering material in a structured way.
  • Extensibility: Through the UNO API, Impress can be extended with extensions and custom scripting, enabling institutions and developers to tailor the tool to their workflows and to integrate it with other components of the Office suite or custom enterprise systems.
  • Templates, fonts, and localization: The software includes templates and is localized for a broad set of languages, supporting global use in schools, public administrations, and small businesses.

Adoption, support, and governance

Apache OpenOffice, including OpenOffice Impress, is distributed as free and open-source software. While the suite enjoys broad usage in education and some government contexts, the market has also seen strong competition from proprietary suites and from other open-source projects such as LibreOffice Impress. Support happens through community forums, documentation, and, for some institutions, paid support arrangements from third-party vendors. The governance of the project emphasizes openness, collaboration, and resilience, with ongoing discussions about roadmap direction, security, and long-term sustainability.

Controversies and debates

  • Open-source development pace versus enterprise needs: In the broader open-source office ecosystem, there is an ongoing discussion about how quickly features are added, how security patches are issued, and how responses to user needs compare with larger proprietary offerings. Proponents argue that open development leads to transparent, adaptable software with fewer vendor lock-ins, while critics contend that enterprise customers require faster release cycles and formal support channels.
  • Interoperability and standards: A central advantage claimed for Impress is compatibility with open standards like the OpenDocument Format (ODF). Critics sometimes question the depth of interoperability with the latest versions of proprietary formats, while supporters emphasize the value of open standards for long-term data access and portability.
  • Governance and community dynamics: The governance of open-source projects can become a point of contention, as communities balance volunteer input, corporate sponsorship, and long-term project stewardship. Advocates of open governance argue it protects user freedom and innovation, while critics may worry about fragmentation or misalignment with user needs. The history of OpenOffice’s transition through different organizational umbrellas is often cited in these debates, alongside the parallel development of LibreOffice and its governance model.
  • Security, reliability, and support: Because Impress is free to use, some organizations weigh its security and reliability against those of paid, commercially supported solutions. Proponents highlight that transparency, community vetting, and the absence of licensing costs offset some concerns, while opponents may demand formalized service-level agreements and guaranteed response times—which are more commonly associated with proprietary offerings.
  • “Woke” criticisms in tech discourse: In broader debates about technology and culture, some commentators argue that open-source communities reflect certain cultural or political priorities. From a practical, market-minded vantage point, the core merit of Impress lies in cost effectiveness, interoperability, and user choice. Critics who allege that open-source ecosystems are dominated by particular cultural narratives are often countered by pointing to the technical and economic benefits of free software, such as reduced vendor dependency, predictable budgeting, and the ability to customize software to fit local needs. Supporters contend that focusing on interoperability and performance matters more than ideological narratives, and that open-source projects should be judged by their usability, stability, and long-term viability rather than by internal debates over culture.

See also