Contents

Non Absorbable SutureEdit

Non-absorbable sutures are surgical thread materials designed to remain in tissue for extended periods after placement. They provide lasting tensile support when natural healing is incomplete or when long-term tissue approximation is necessary. They are generally contrasted with absorbable sutures, which are designed to break down and be absorbed by the body over time. In practice, surgeons select non-absorbable sutures for situations such as skin closures that require extended immobilization, tendon and ligament repairs, vascular anastomoses, and certain orthopedic or ocular procedures where long-term stability is desired. See also Suture and Absorbable suture for broader context on wound closure materials.

The choice of non-absorbable suture is influenced by material properties, tissue type, patient factors, and the anticipated duration of support needed. The goal is to achieve secure closure with minimal tissue reaction while allowing for the planned outcome of the operation. Important considerations include handling characteristics, knot security, memory, and the potential for long-term complications such as chronic irritation or suture-related extrusion. See Tissue healing and Knot (surgical) for related concepts.

Materials and properties

Non-absorbable sutures come in several material families, each with distinct advantages and limitations. The main categories include monofilament and braided forms, with various specific materials used across specialties. Common examples are nylon, polypropylene, polyester, stainless steel, and polytetrafluoroethylene, among others. For example, nylon has broad utility in soft-tissue closures and certain microsurgical procedures, while polypropylene is often favored for vascular and ophthalmic applications due to high inertness. See Nylon and Polypropylene for detailed material profiles, and Polytetrafluoroethylene for information on PTFE-based options. In addition, braided polyester sutures (e.g., Ethibond) provide high strength and handling characteristics, though they can provoke more tissue reaction than monofilament options. See Polyester (synthetic polymer) for more on that material class. Stainless steel sutures are used where very high initial strength is required, such as in orthopedic wiring or sternotomy closures; see Stainless steel for background on these metal sutures.

  • Monofilament vs braided

    • Monofilament sutures have a single filament, which generally minimizes tissue drag and may reduce bacterial harboring along the strand. They tend to have less tissue trauma and easier to handle in delicate applications. See Monofilament.
    • Braided sutures consist of multiple intertwined filaments, offering excellent knot security and handling in some tissues, but they can harbor bacteria more readily and may provoke greater tissue reaction. See Braided suture for a broader discussion.

  • Coatings and memory

    • Some sutures are coated to ease passage through tissue and reduce drag, while others rely on natural surface properties. Memory (the tendency of a suture to keep its curled shape) can influence knot-tying behavior and handling. See Coated suture and Suture memory for more detail.

  • Sterilization and biocompatibility

    • Non-absorbable sutures are manufactured to be highly biocompatible and to resist degradation in the body. They are sterilized using standard medical procedures to prevent infection. See Sterilization (bioengineering) and Biocompatibility for related topics.

Common non-absorbable suture materials

  • Nylon (polyamide) – typically monofilament, offering good tensile strength and relatively low tissue reactivity. Used widely for skin closures and soft-tissue repairs; see Nylon.
  • Polypropylene – a highly inert, monofilament material with excellent long-term strength and low tissue reactivity; commonly used in vascular and ophthalmic procedures; see Polypropylene.
  • Polyester (braided) – strong and durable, often braided (e.g., Ethibond). Higher tissue reactivity than nylon or polypropylene but useful in certain deep-tissue closures; see Polyester (synthetic polymer).
  • Stainless steel – metallic sutures used where very high initial strength is required, such as bone repair, sternotomy wires, and some orthopedic applications; see Stainless steel.
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) – inert and non-absorbable, available in monofilament or braided forms; favored in some microsurgical and cardiovascular contexts; see Polytetrafluoroethylene.
  • Silk (natural) – a traditional braided material with good handling but higher tissue reactivity and slower degradation in vivo; used less frequently today in favor of synthetic non-absorbables; see Silk (fiber).

Indications and clinical considerations

Non-absorbable sutures are selected when long-term tissue support is essential or when tissue healing is anticipated to be prolonged. Typical indications include: - Skin closures where durable cosmetic or functional outcomes are needed; see Wound closure and Dermal healing. - Tendon and ligament repairs, where persistent strength is necessary to withstand mechanical load during long healing periods; see Tendon (anatomy) and Ligament. - Vascular anastomoses and certain cardiovascular procedures requiring enduring patency; see Vascular surgery and Cardiovascular surgery. - Orthopedic fixation and bone-related closures in which permanence of the suture is beneficial; see Orthopedic surgery.

Factors guiding selection include tissue type, anticipated healing time, infection risk, patient comorbidity, and the need for later suture removal or radiographic visibility. Some non-absorbable sutures are easier to remove from superficial tissues, while others are designed for left in place permanently or for long durations depending on the clinical scenario. See Wound management and Postoperative care for broader context.

Handling, techniques, and complications

  • Knot security and handling: Braided sutures can provide robust knot security but may harbor bacteria more readily, whereas monofilament sutures tend to glide cleanly but can require more precise technique to ensure secure knots. See Surgical knot and Knot security.
  • Tissue reaction: Some materials provoke more inflammatory responses than others. Monofilaments generally produce less tissue reaction than braided sutures, influencing choice in contaminated or inflamed fields. See Tissue reaction.
  • Infection risk: All sutures carry some risk of infection, mitigated by sterile technique, appropriate material choice, and skin preparation. See Surgical site infection.
  • Extrusion and migration: Though uncommon with modern materials, long-term implants can irritate tissue or become exposed, particularly in areas under constant movement or poor tissue coverage. See Suture extrusion.

Removal and long-term considerations

  • Removal is common for skin or superficial closures where long-term presence is not desired; timing depends on anatomical site, healing rate, and clinical judgment. See Suture removal.
  • In some contexts, non-absorbable sutures are intended to remain indefinitely, particularly in deep or structural repairs where removal would not be feasible or appropriate. See Permanent sutures for related concepts.

History and development

Progress in non-absorbable sutures reflects a shift from natural materials to synthetic polymers, with improvements in strength, biocompatibility, and handling. Early sutures used natural fibers; later advances introduced nylon and polypropylene as durable, inert options. The ongoing refinement of coatings, memory characteristics, and braiding patterns continues to influence surgical practice across specialties. See History of sutures for a broader historical overview.

See also