Contents

Multi Terminal HvdcEdit

Multi-terminal HVDC

Multi-terminal HVDC (MTDC) refers to a grid topology that connects more than two points via direct current links to form a network rather than a single point-to-point connection. In MTDC, multiple HVDC converter stations share a common or interconnected direct-current bus, enabling power to be routed between several alternating-current (AC) systems that may be asynchronous or geographically separated. This architecture is especially attractive for integrating large amounts of offshore generation, connecting regional grids, and improving transmission efficiency over long distances.

MTDC networks build on the longstanding HVDC principle, which uses converters to control the flow of electricity with high efficiency, low losses over long corridors, and the ability to connect AC systems that do not share the same frequency or phase. By extending HVDC from the traditional two-terminal link to a multi-terminal arrangement, designers gain greater flexibility for power routing, system resilience, and the accommodation of large renewable-energy resources.

Technology and architectures

  • Topologies and operation

    • Radial MTDC: a tree-like arrangement where each terminal connects to a central DC bus, which can simplify protection schemes but may limit some degrees of freedom in power routing.
    • Meshed MTDC: a network where multiple converters are interconnected on a common DC backbone, offering higher redundancy and improved control of power flows. This configuration is more complex to supervise and protect but provides greater operational flexibility for cross-border energy sharing and islanding scenarios.
    • Common DC bus versus decoupled DC links: some MTDC designs use a shared DC bus with local interties, while others connect terminals via multiple interconnected DC paths to create redundancy and alternate routes for power transfer.

  • Cable types and physical layers

    • Overhead HVDC lines, submarine HVDC cables, and land HVDC cables can all participate in MTDC networks, with subsea cables playing a growing role in offshore wind and hydro projects. See HVDC submarine cable for details on underwater transmission media.

  • Converter technologies

    • LCC-HVDC (Line-commutated converters): traditional HVDC technology using thyristors. They are robust for large bulk transfers but require strong auxiliary power and reactive support on the AC side, and they are less flexible for islanding or black-start tasks.
    • VSC-HVDC (Voltage-source converter HVDC): modern HVDC technology based on IGBTs or similar devices, offering fast dynamic response, independent control of active and reactive power, black-start capability, and suitability for direct connection to weaker or asynchronous grids. VSC-based MTDC networks are widely viewed as a practical path for meshed, offshore-integrated grids.
    • Converter stations and auxiliary equipment: each terminal includes a converter valve, cooling and protection systems, transformer interfaces, harmonic filters, and protection logic to manage fault currents and transient events.

  • Protection and control

    • DC circuit breakers (DCCBs) or fast disconnection devices are essential in MTDC to isolate faults and prevent cascading outages. See DC circuit breaker.
    • Control strategies must coordinate active power (flow control), voltage on the DC bus, and interaction with adjacent AC grids. Local control at each terminal competes with centralized or distributed coordination to optimize reliability and efficiency.
    • Protection schemes in MTDC differ from conventional AC grids due to the absence of natural zero-crossings in DC and the need to rapidly isolate faults without destabilizing neighboring terminals. See Protection relay and Grid code for related topics.

  • Operation and grid integration

    • Control of MTDC networks involves managing power flow, voltage levels, and stability across multiple AC systems that may have different tariffs, regulations, and market designs. This requires advanced supervisory control, data acquisition (SCADA) systems, and cross-border cooperation.
    • Islanding capability and seamless transfer between regional grids are often cited advantages of MTDC, particularly when integrating large offshore wind farms or connecting disparate national networks.

Converter technologies and technical considerations

  • Power electronics and efficiency

    • MTDC relies on high-power converters with sophisticated switching devices. The efficiency and dynamic performance of VSC-based MTDC are typically superior for applications requiring rapid response, reactive power control, and modular expansion.
    • Filtering, harmonic management, and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) considerations are important for maintaining power quality on both the AC and DC sides.

  • Interaction with offshore and onshore systems

    • Offshore wind integration benefits from MTDC by allowing multiple platforms to feed a shared DC backbone, enabling consolidated export to shore and easier routing of power to different markets.
    • Onshore interconnections can leverage MTDC to increase cross-border trade, improve outage resilience, and reduce the need for long AC transmission lines.

Control, protection, and reliability

  • Coordinated control frameworks

    • Effective MTDC operation requires coordinated voltage and power-flow control across all terminals. This involves centralized optimization algorithms, reliable communication, and robust cybersecurity measures to prevent disruptions.
    • Market and grid codes influence how MTDC devices participate in energy markets, frequency response, and ancillary services.

  • Protection challenges

    • DC faults must be cleared quickly to avoid damage and unscheduled outages. This makes the choice and deployment of DC circuit breakers and protection schemes a central design concern.
    • The interaction of MTDC with AC networks during faults or islanding events demands careful planning to avoid unintended island formation or uncontrolled islanding.

  • Reliability and economics

    • While MTDC can reduce line losses and enable renewable energy access, the capital cost is substantial, and the value depends on the scale of wind, solar, hydro resources, or cross-border interconnections it serves.
    • Regulatory, permitting, and cross-border运 issues influence deployment timelines and long-term ownership models.

Applications and case examples

  • Offshore wind integration

    • MTDC is seen as a key enabler for large offshore wind farms that require high-capacity backbones to collect power from multiple platforms and deliver it to shore efficiently. See Offshore wind power.

  • Regional interconnections

    • By linking neighboring grids with a meshed HVDC backbone, MTDC can improve reliability and enable cross-border energy trade, especially where AC grids are asynchronous or uneven in strength. See Grid interconnection.

  • Research and demonstration projects

    • Numerous research laboratories and industry consortia test MTDC concepts on smaller scales or within pilot networks to validate control strategies, protection schemes, and economic viability. See IEEE 2030.6 for related standards and CIGRE discussions on HVDC grids.

Controversies and debates

  • Costs and economic viability

    • Critics argue MTDC projects require substantial upfront investment and long lead times. Proponents contend the long-term savings from reduced transmission losses, greater renewable integration, and improved security of supply justify the costs when scaled across multiple large projects.

  • Reliability and protection risk

    • The complexity of coordinating multiple converters, control centers, and protection systems raises concerns about reliability. Advocates emphasize that proper design, standardization, and industry collaboration can mitigate these risks, while critics highlight potential single points of failure or cyber-risk considerations.

  • Regulatory and market design

    • MTDC interacts with cross-border markets, tariff regimes, and grid codes. Debates center on who bears construction and maintenance costs, how benefits are allocated across regions, and how to align incentives for investment in such infrastructure with public policy goals.

  • Sovereignty, security, and public acceptance

    • While MTDC can enhance energy security by diversifying supply and reducing dependence on a single corridor, it also raises concerns about critical infrastructure ownership, cross-border control, and the need for robust protection against outages or external interference. These debates intersect with standard regulatory approaches and national security considerations.

See also