Contents

MtkviewpreferredframespersecondEdit

MTKView, a core component of MetalKit, offers developers a straightforward way to render Metal content into a view. Among its configuration options, the preferredFramesPerSecond property stands out as a practical knob for balancing visual smoothness, battery life, and rendering complexity. This article explains what that property does, how it interacts with device capabilities, and how to use it effectively in real-world apps.

MTKView and the concept of frame rate MTKView is designed to provide a bridge between a Metal render pipeline and a screen-backed view. It coordinates the timing of draw calls with the system’s display pipeline, enabling smooth presentation of frames produced by the GPU. The preferredFramesPerSecond property is a hint to the system about the target update frequency for that MTKView. By adjusting this value, developers can tailor rendering cadence to the needs of the app—whether that’s a resource-intensive game that benefits from higher frame rates or a data-visualization tool that prioritizes battery life over ultra-smooth motion. For background context, MTKView is part of MetalKit and relies on features common to the broader Metal ecosystem.

Overview

  • What it is: A property on MTKView that communicates the desired number of frames the view should render per second.
    • The property is expressed as an integer, representing frames per second (fps). Typical values include 60, 120, or other rates supported by the target display and device.
    • If the value is set to 0 or left at a default that effectively means “as fast as possible,” the system will render in a way that best matches the display’s capabilities.
  • Why it matters: The choice influences CPU/GPU workload, battery consumption, and perceived smoothness. A higher fps generally yields smoother motion but uses more power; a lower fps can extend battery life and reduce thermal load, especially on mobile devices.
  • Where it fits: It interacts with other rendering controls in MTKView and the surrounding app lifecycle, including the render loop, display synchronization, and the device’s display capabilities. See also ProMotion technology on capable devices and how it relates to frame pacing.

Technical details

  • How it works in practice: When you set mtkView.preferredFramesPerSecond to a non-zero value, the render loop aims to deliver frames at that cadence. The system then schedules draw calls to align with the display’s refresh cycle, subject to device performance and power considerations.
  • Interaction with display refresh: On devices with higher refresh rates (for example, those supporting ProMotion at 120 Hz), setting a higher preferredFramesPerSecond can unlock smoother motion if the app’s rendering workload can sustain it. Conversely, on a standard 60 Hz display, setting 120 fps won’t create more distinct frames than the display can show.
  • Interaction with the run loop: In many MTKView configurations, the render loop is driven by the view’s delegate methods. The preferredFramesPerSecond value helps the system determine how often those delegate callbacks occur, but actual timing remains subject to the device’s scheduling and thermal state.

Practical usage patterns

  • When to set higher frame rates: For action-heavy rendering, games, or interactive simulations where perceived smoothness is critical, setting a higher fps can improve responsiveness and visual fidelity.
  • When to favor lower frame rates: For apps that present static or slowly changing content, or when running on battery-constrained devices, a lower fps reduces CPU/GPU load and power usage without a dramatic loss of perceived quality.
  • How to choose values: Many developers use 60 as a baseline on most devices. If the target devices include ProMotion-capable displays, experimenting with 120 can be beneficial, provided the rendering workload can sustain it. If battery life is a priority, values like 30 or 15 may offer meaningful savings while still delivering acceptable visual updates for certain content.
  • Examples of usage patterns:
    • A high-fidelity game might set mtkView.preferredFramesPerSecond = 60 or 120, depending on device capability and performance profiling.
    • A data visualization tool showing streaming metrics could use a modest rate like 30 to balance update freshness with energy efficiency.
    • A simple UI with occasional animations might rely on the default behavior, letting the system adapt the frame rate to the display’s capabilities.
  • Related concepts: The choice interacts with CADisplayLink-driven loops and with the app’s overall energy strategy, including memory usage, texture streaming, and shader complexity.

Performance considerations and controversies

  • Battery life vs. visual smoothness: The central trade-off is energy consumption. Higher frame rates demand more GPU time and can shorten battery life on mobile devices. From a practical standpoint, developers often optimize by targeting the minimum fps that preserves the desired user experience and by using performance profiling tools to understand heat and power characteristics.
  • Hardware variability: Different devices offer different display capabilities. A value that works well on a high-refresh-capability device may be less beneficial on a standard 60 Hz panel. Designing adaptable rendering strategies can mitigate this mismatch.
  • Perception and user expectations: In some scenarios, users may notice stutter or judder if the app's animation logic cannot sustain the chosen frame rate. The best practice is to match the frame rate target to the actual rendering performance, avoiding frequent drops in frame cadence.
  • Comparisons with alternative approaches: Some developers rely on CADisplayLink for timing control, while MTKView’s mechanism can offer tighter integration with the Metal rendering pipeline. The choice depends on the app architecture, performance goals, and platform conventions.

See also