Contents

List Of States In The German ConfederationEdit

The German Confederation (Deutscher Bund) arose from the reshaping of Europe after the Napoleonic era and the Congress of Vienna. Created in 1815 as a loose, multi-sovereign association, it brought together a broad swath of German-speaking states under a framework designed to balance power, preserve monarchic order, and prevent the rise of a single, centralized nation-state that might threaten the constitutional order across Central Europe. Its members ranged from great powers to tiny principalities, with Austria and Prussia serving as the dominant players. The arrangement emphasized the preservation of state sovereignty and local governance, while establishing a common forum for mutual defense and diplomacy. Over its existence, the federation wrestled with the tension between traditional monarchical stability and rising liberal currents, a tension that would ultimately contribute to its dissolution in 1866 after the Austro-Prussian War.

The membership of the German Confederation spanned several classes of states, from large empires and kingdoms to small duchies and free cities. The central organ, the Bundestag (Federal Diet), met in Frankfurt and coordinated limited common policies, but real authority lay with the individual rulers and their administrations. This structure reflected a political philosophy that prioritized gradual reform, property rights, and the plural, federated character of the German-speaking lands over rapid, centralized modernization. In practice, the Confederation sought to manage regional rivalries, preserve traditional arrangements, and provide a conservative bulwark against radical upheavals that could threaten stability across the region. The period also saw episodes of liberal agitation, conservative crackdowns, and periodic calls for national unification, debates that would shape the path toward a modern nation-state centuries later. For an overview of the broader political context, see Congress of Vienna and Austro-Prussian War.

States and territories

Large monarchies and principal powers

Austria – the imperial powerhouse that dominated much of the Confederation’s diplomacy and internal balance, represented in the federation as a major member with extensive regional holdings. See Austrian Empire.
Kingdom of Prussia – the other great power in the federation, influential in shaping policy and the long-run trajectory toward unification. See Kingdom of Prussia.
Kingdom of Bavaria
Kingdom of Saxony
Kingdom of Württemberg

Grand duchies

Grand Duchy of Baden
Grand Duchy of Hesse
Grand Duchy of Mecklenburg-Schwerin
Grand Duchy of Mecklenburg-Strelitz
Grand Duchy of Oldenburg
Grand Duchy of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Luxembourg)

Duchies

Duchy of Anhalt (Dessau, Bernburg, Köthen) – historically divided into smaller lines within the confederation
Duchy of Nassau
Duchy of Brunswick (Braunschweig)
Duchy of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (initially Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld; later the merged Saxe-Coburg and Gotha)
Duchies of Hohenzollern-Hechingen and Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen

Principalities and minor states

Reuss Elder Line
Reuss Younger Line
Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt
Schwarzburg-Sondershausen
Lippe
Waldeck and Pyrmont
Schaumburg-Lippe
Hesse-Homburg

Free and Hanseatic cities

Free City of Frankfurt am Main
Free City of Hamburg
Free City of Lübeck
Free City of Bremen

Note on Luxembourg

Luxembourg, as a Grand Duchy in personal union with the Netherlands at the time, participated in the German Confederation as a distinct territorial entity with its own duchal status and local governance under the broader imperial framework.

Controversies and debates from a conservative-leaning perspective

State sovereignty versus central coordination: The Confederation’s core design protected the autonomy of dozens of states, a stance favored by those who valued traditional monarchical legitimacy and property rights. Critics, especially liberal reformers, argued that such a loose structure prevented a unified German state and impeded economic and political modernization. Advocates of the status quo contended that centralized power would risk eroding local liberties and destabilizing established orders.
Leadership balance between Austria and Prussia: The federation entrenched a balance of power between the two dominant states. From a conservative viewpoint, this arrangement helped prevent any single state from imposing its will on the German lands and provided a stable framework in a volatile post-Napoleonic era. Critics contended that this power-sharing often paralyzed decisive action and delayed necessary reforms, ultimately contributing to the conditions that produced a Prussian-led unification process later in the century.
Liberalism, nationalism, and reform: The period saw rising liberal and nationalist sentiments that sought constitutional guarantees, broadened participation, and national unification. Conservatives argued that rapid liberalization could destabilize the legal and social order, provoke revolutionary movements, and threaten property rights and dynastic legitimacy. Proponents of reform countered that peaceful, legal evolution and constitutional constraints were essential to longer-term stability; conservatives maintained that order and gradualism ultimately protected continuity and social harmony.
The 1848 revolutions and their aftermath: The so-called revolutions of 1848 exposed the tensions between liberal demands for a unified German nation and conservative insistence on monarchical sovereignty. A conservative reading emphasizes the suppression of radicalism, the restoration of order, and the preservation of the federative system as the path to gradual, sober progress. Critics on the left argue that the response was too heavy-handed and delayed meaningful constitutional advances. In the conservative view, the eventual tightening of the federation’s constitutional framework contributed to a more durable, if slower, trajectory toward a German state that could defend its interests in a turbulent Europe.
The question of unification and the federation’s dissolution: For conservatives, the dissolution of the German Confederation after the Austro-Prussian War of 1866 marked the end of a flawed attempt at a multi-state federation and the opening of a new, Prussia-led trajectory toward national unity. The right generally views this as a rational reconfiguration that aligned German interests with a more effective, centralized leadership under Prussia while preserving order and the sensible balance of power. Detractors argue that the dissolution closed off a peaceful path to unification and left German unity dependent on military conflict rather than constitutional evolution.