Contents

Left Child Right Sibling RepresentationEdit

Left Child Right Sibling Representation is a classical method for encoding a general rooted tree as a binary-tree-like structure by storing two pointers in each node: a left pointer to the node's first child and a right pointer to the node's next sibling. This representation, also known as the first-child/next-sibling model, enables the use of binary-tree traversal techniques to navigate and manipulate non-binary trees. It is widely used in compilers, file systems, and other systems where dynamic, irregular n-ary trees must be managed with modest memory overhead.

In the left-child right-sibling scheme, every node contains two references rather than a single pointer to a parent or to all children. The left pointer (often described as the first-child) points to the node's earliest child, while the right pointer (the next-sibling) points to the node's immediate sibling to the right. By chaining through right pointers, all siblings of a node are visited; by following the left pointer from a parent, you enter the list of its children. This structure reduces the problem of representing an arbitrary number of children to a fixed two-pointer model per node, which can simplify memory management and algorithm design in environments where direct arrays of children are impractical.

This representation is particularly convenient because it allows general-tree algorithms to be implemented with the familiar machinery of binary-tree algorithms. For example, a traversal that processes a node, then its children, and then its siblings can be implemented with straightforward recursion or with a loop that follows left and then right pointers. See discussions of Binary tree techniques and how they relate to N-ary tree traversal in practice. The terminology uses terms like the First-child and the Next-sibling to emphasize its two-pointer structure rather than any spatial geometry.

Structure and Representation

In a typical LCRS node, two pointers suffice: - left (first-child): points to the node’s first child, if any. - right (next-sibling): points to the node’s next sibling, if any.

If a node has no children, its left pointer is null. If a node has no further siblings, its right pointer is null. An n-ary tree is thus represented as a binary-tree-like structure where a parent’s children form a linked list via right pointers, anchored at the parent’s left pointer.

Example: - Consider a root node r with children a, b, c (in that order). - r.left → a - a.right → b - b.right → c - c.right → null - a.left, b.left, c.left → null (unless they themselves have children)

This encoding preserves the parent-child relationships and makes it easy to navigate to siblings and to descend into children using only two pointers per node. See similarly described patterns in First-child/next-sibling implementations and how they relate to the broader concept of Tree (data structure) representations.

Operations and Traversal

Because the structure mirrors a binary tree, standard binary-tree traversal ideas can be adapted to general trees: - Preorder-like traversal: visit a node, recursively traverse its left child (the first child), then traverse its right siblings as needed. - Postorder-like traversal and other orders can be similarly defined by combining visits to the left pointer and the chain of right pointers.

Pseudocode for a simple preorder traversal: - traverse(node): - if node is null, return - visit(node) - traverse(node.left) // first child and its descendants - traverse(node.right) // next sibling and its descendants

Insertion and deletion of children operate via pointer manipulation: - Inserting a new child as the first child of a parent P: - newChild.right = P.left - P.left = newChild - Inserting a new child after an existing child C: - newChild.right = C.right - C.right = newChild - Deleting a child requires locating the target among P’s children and updating the appropriate right pointers, along with deallocation as needed.

Access to a specific k-th child typically requires stepping along k-1 right pointers from the first child, yielding O(k) time in the worst case. This makes random access to a particular child slower than in dense representations, but it preserves a compact two-pointer-per-node footprint.

Advantages and Trade-offs

  • Memory efficiency: Each node carries two pointers, regardless of the number of children, which can be advantageous when the tree is sparse or highly irregular. This can be preferable to per-node arrays of variable length or more complex child lists in certain environments.
  • Unified traversal methods: The two-pointer scheme lets developers apply binary-tree traversal and memory-management techniques to general trees without specialized data structures.
  • Simplicity in dynamic updates: Insertion or deletion of a child at the beginning of the child list can be performed with a small, constant number of pointer updates.
  • Access cost for deeper or numerous children: If a node has many children, locating a specific child requires walking along the right-pointer chain, which can be slower than direct indexing into a per-node child array. In performance-critical code, this trade-off is weighed against the memory savings and simplicity.

Variants and Naming

The core idea is the same across variants; common alternate names emphasize the same two-pointer structure: - first-child/next-sibling (often highlighted to avoid the potential confusion implied by the words "left" and "right" in some contexts) - left-child right-sibling - leftmost-child right-sibling

In literature and implementations, the choice of terminology can reflect preferences for clarity or alignment with compiler and operating-system sources where such trees arise.

History and Use

The left-child right-sibling representation has a long history in computer science, particularly in early language implementations, parsing trees, and file-system metaphors where general trees were common but memory and pointer constraints were tight. It remains a teaching model and a practical option in resource-constrained environments or when translating a general tree into a form amenable to binary-tree techniques.

See also