Contents

Ifrs 11 Joint ArrangementsEdit

IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements is an International Financial Reporting Standard established by the IFRS framework to govern how entities account for arrangements in which two or more parties share control. The standard centers on the idea of joint control and the classification of joint arrangements into two distinct forms, each with its own accounting treatment. By defining how assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses should be recognized in these contexts, IFRS 11 aims to improve comparability across companies and jurisdictions.

IFRS 11 was introduced to replace earlier guidance that allowed proportional consolidation for joint ventures and helped align reporting with the economic substance of joint control. It emphasizes that joint control arises from a contractual arrangement requiring the unanimous consent of the venturers for certain activities, rather than being presumed from the level of influence a single party may have. The standard also interacts with other parts of the IFRS suite, such as IAS 28 on the equity method and IFRS 12 on disclosures about interests in other entities.

Key concepts

  • joint control: The contractually agreed sharing of control over an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. This concept anchors the classification under IFRS 11. See also Joint control.
  • joint arrangements: Any arrangement where two or more parties have joint control. Under IFRS 11, such arrangements are categorized into two forms, each with a distinct accounting approach. See also Joint arrangement.
  • forms of joint arrangements: IFRS 11 distinguishes between

Types of joint arrangements

Joint operations

In a joint operation, the venturer recognizes in its financial statements its share of the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses of the joint arrangement. This reflects the venturer’s rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities to the extent of its interest. The accounting mirrors the substance of the venturer’s involvement in the joint arrangement, without creating a separate investment entity. See also Consolidation (accounting).

Joint ventures

In a joint venture, the venturer recognizes its interest as an investment accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, the venturer initially records the investment at cost and subsequently adjusts the carrying amount for its share of the joint venture’s profits or losses, distributions, and other changes in net assets. This approach emphasizes the investor’s economic interest in the joint venture rather than the venture’s individual assets and liabilities. See also Equity method and IAS 28.

Accounting treatments

  • For joint operations:

    • Recognize the venturer’s share of assets and liabilities connected with the joint arrangement.
    • Recognize revenue and expenses according to the venturer’s rights to and obligations for the joint activities.
    • Disclosures focus on the nature and extent of the venturer’s involvement.

  • For joint ventures:

    • Use the equity method to account for the investment in the joint venture.
    • Recognize the venturer’s share of the joint venture’s profits or losses in its own profit or loss.
    • Adjust the carrying amount of the investment for changes in the joint venture’s net assets and for impairment as needed.
    • Disclosures address the nature of the joint venture interests and the risks associated with those interests. See also Consolidation (accounting) and IFRS 12 for related disclosure requirements.

Transition and implementation

IFRS 11 became effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. Enterprises adopting IFRS 11 generally applied retrospective transition with certain practical expedients and disclosures in the opening balance sheets. The transition had a meaningful impact on reported assets and liabilities for entities with significant joint ventures, since many previously proportionately consolidated joint ventures shifted to the equity method. See also IFRS 10 for broader implications on consolidation and control concepts.

Disclosures and scope

  • IFRS 11 requires disclosures that help users understand the nature of joint arrangements, the extent of an entity’s involvement, and the risks arising from those arrangements. These disclosures complement the information provided by IFRS 12 on interests in other entities.
  • The standard applies to joint arrangements that are not fully consolidated through other IFRS processes and interacts with other standards governing assets, liabilities, income, and disclosures. See also Joint control and Joint operation.

Controversies and debates (neutral overview)

  • Transparency versus comparability: Proponents argue that IFRS 11 improves comparability across entities by standardizing how joint control is measured and reported, particularly by using the equity method for joint ventures. Critics contend that equity accounting can obscure the underlying asset and liability positions of a venture, potentially reducing transparency about leverage and capital commitments.
  • Proportionate consolidation vs. equity method: IFRS 11 eliminated the option of proportionate consolidation for joint ventures, replacing it with the equity method. Supporters say this aligns the accounting with the economic substance of joint ventures and simplifies consolidation, while opponents argue it can distort key financial metrics, such as asset bases and debt levels, and create incentives to restructure joint ventures to maintain favorable accounting treatment.
  • Judgment and complexity: Determining whether an arrangement constitutes a joint operation or a joint venture can involve significant judgments about control, decision-making rights, and the relevance of activities. Critics claim these judgments can lead to inconsistent reporting in the absence of strict, objective criteria, while supporters emphasize that the standard provides clear criteria that reflect substantive control rather than formal titles.
  • Global convergence: As with other IFRS standards, IFRS 11’s adoption supports global consistency in financial reporting. Some jurisdictions have aligned domestic guidance or provided supplementary interpretations to reconcile local practices with IFRS 11, generating debates about whether additional standards or guidance are needed to address sector-specific arrangements. See also IFRS and IFRS 12.

See also