Contents

GetelementsbyclassnameEdit

GetElementsByClassName is a standard, time-tested tool in the web developer’s toolkit. It is part of the browser’s Document Object Model (DOM) and provides a straightforward way to locate elements by their class attribute. In practice, this method aligns with the CSS notion of class selectors, offering a predictable, language-integrated approach to gathering elements for further manipulation. Like many core API surfaces, it is widely supported across modern browsers and remains a staple in vanilla JavaScript code and in a variety of UI patterns found in production sites and apps. JavaScript Document Object Model HTML CSS selectors

Overview

document.getElementsByClassName(classNames) returns a live, HTMLCollection of elements that possess all of the class names specified in the classNames string. The string can contain one or more class names separated by whitespace, and the method matches elements that include every class listed. This behavior mirrors how CSS selectors work when multiple classes are involved, making the API intuitive for developers who are already thinking in CSS terms. HTMLCollection CSS selectors querySelectorAll

How it works

Return type and live collection

  • The result is an HTMLCollection, which is a live, ordered list of elements. If the DOM changes so that elements gain or lose the requested classes, the collection updates automatically. This can be a benefit for dynamic UIs, but it also means the collection is not a static snapshot. HTMLCollection DOM

Class-name syntax

  • The argument is a string containing one or more class names separated by spaces. To require multiple classes, you list all of them. For example, elements that have both "menu" and "active" will be included. This mirrors how CSS class selectors work. CSS selectors DOM

Scope and availability

  • The method exists on the Document interface as well as on Element, meaning you can use it to search the whole document or to scope searches to a particular subtree. This makes it convenient for both page-wide operations and component-level interactions. Document Object Model Element querySelectorAll

Performance and trade-offs

  • Because the collection is live, operations that modify the DOM can affect the set in real time. In some scenarios, this can introduce performance considerations during tight loops or frequent updates. For static needs, some developers prefer querySelectorAll, which returns a static NodeList. NodeList querySelectorAll

Practical usage

  • Basic selection js // Get all elements with the class "menu" var menus = document.getElementsByClassName('menu');

  • Multiple classes js // Get elements that have both "menu" and "active" var activeMenus = document.getElementsByClassName('menu active');

  • Iterating safely (since the collection is live) js var items = document.getElementsByClassName('item'); for (var i = 0; i < items.length; i++) { items[i].style.color = 'blue'; }

  • Converting to a standard array for array methods js var itemsArray = Array.from(items); itemsArray.forEach(function(el) { el.style.fontWeight = 'bold'; }); Array.from HTMLCollection NodeList CSS selectors

Comparisons and alternatives

  • querySelectorAll vs getElementsByClassName
    • querySelectorAll returns a static NodeList, which does not update as the DOM changes. This can be advantageous when you want a stable snapshot to iterate over, without worrying about elements being added or removed during the loop. It also supports more complex selectors beyond simple class names. querySelectorAll NodeList CSS selectors
    • getElementsByClassName is often faster for simple class-based queries and maps directly to the CSS class concept, which can feel more natural when you’re explicitly selecting by class attributes. However, because it is live, it can have surprising behavior if you modify the DOM while iterating. HTMLCollection DOM
  • Other DOM methods

Controversies and debates (pragmatic, developer-centric)

  • Live vs static collections
    • Proponents of live HTMLCollection argue that it provides a natural, real-time view of the document, reducing the need to re-query after DOM changes. Critics note that live collections can complicate loops and updates, potentially causing reflows or subtle bugs if elements are added or removed during iteration. In many code bases, a static NodeList from querySelectorAll is preferred for predictable iteration. HTMLCollection NodeList querySelectorAll
  • Simplicity vs flexibility
    • The getElementsByClassName API is simple and maps cleanly to CSS class usage. Some developers argue that for more complex selection logic, a combination of CSS selectors and querySelectorAll offers greater flexibility, without sacrificing clarity. The debate often comes down to how much type-safety, predictability, and future-proofing a codebase needs. CSS selectors querySelectorAll
  • Frameworks and direct DOM querying
    • In large, component-based frameworks, there is a trend toward letting the framework manage the DOM rather than performing direct, ad-hoc queries. This can improve maintainability and update guarantees, but it also means older or simpler APIs like getElementsByClassName may be underutilized in favor of higher-level abstractions. The choice depends on project goals, team expertise, and performance considerations. JavaScript Document Object Model CSS selectors
  • Compatibility and polyfills
    • While getElementsByClassName is well-supported in current environments, older browsers required polyfills or alternative approaches. This ongoing compatibility consideration informs decisions in projects that must reach a broad audience. Browser compatibility Internet Explorer

See also