Endocrine ReviewsEdit
Endocrine Reviews is a leading peer‑reviewed medical journal that furnishes comprehensive assessments of current knowledge in the field of endocrinology. Published by the Endocrine Society in partnership with a major academic publisher, it serves clinicians, researchers, and students who need authoritative syntheses of complex topics. The journal emphasizes rigorous methods, translational relevance, and clear conclusions that can inform patient care as well as future research directions. In a discipline where new discoveries continually reshape practice, Endocrine Reviews strives to provide stable, evidence-based reference points.
The journal’s audience spans specialists and generalists alike, from those diagnosing thyroid disorders to those studying metabolic regulation and reproductive endocrinology. Its articles often integrate molecular mechanisms with clinical implications, helping readers navigate both bench science and bedside applications. As a platform for scholarly dialogue, it also reflects ongoing debates within endocrinology about best practices, study design, and the interpretation of emerging data. endocrinology Endocrine Society clinical guidelines
Endocrine Reviews is anchored in the tradition of high-quality review scholarship. It publishes state‑of‑the‑art analyses that survey the literature, critique competing models, and offer forward-looking perspectives. Although the journal celebrates scientific innovation, it remains committed to methodological rigor, disclosure of conflicts of interest, and editorial independence. In this way, it seeks to balance the curiosity of discovery with the responsibility of reliable patient guidance. Readers can expect to encounter literature reviews that bridge basic science and clinical practice, often with recommendations that reflect consensus where it exists or clearly delineate areas of uncertainty. peer review conflict of interest translational medicine
This article considers Endocrine Reviews from a traditional, results‑driven perspective on science and medicine. It acknowledges that controversies exist in endocrinology—ranging from translational gaps to debates over how best to balance innovation with patient safety—and discusses them with an emphasis on evidence, reproducibility, and practical relevance. It also engages with broader debates about how science is funded, published, and accessed, while insisting that the core task of the journal remains the synthesis of reliable, verifiable knowledge that can guide clinicians and policymakers. open access systematic review clinical practice guidelines
Overview
Aims and scope
Endocrine Reviews publishes comprehensive reviews across the spectrum of endocrinology, including molecular endocrinology, physiology, and clinical applications. Topics commonly covered include hormone signaling and regulation, metabolism, and diseases of the endocrine organs such as the thyroid, pancreas, pituitary, adrenal glands, and gonads. The journal also addresses endocrine disruptors, bone metabolism, and neuroendocrine interactions. hormone signal transduction bone remodeling bone metabolism diabetes mellitus thyroid gland pancreas pituitary gland adrenal cortex
The format emphasizes synthesis rather than primary research reporting, with an emphasis on clarity, translational relevance, and the implications for patient care. Authors are typically acknowledged experts who distill a broad literature into a coherent framework. translational medicine clinical practice guidelines
Editorial policy and peer review
Endocrine Reviews operates under a structured editorial process intended to preserve objectivity and integrity. Submissions undergo peer review, with disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and provisions for editorial independence. peer review conflict of interest editorial independence
The journal’s policies aim to balance timely dissemination with thorough vetting, ensuring that reviews reflect current best evidence while clearly indicating areas where evidence is evolving or contested. evidence-based medicine reproducibility
Access and publishing model
Like many leading journals, Endocrine Reviews uses a hybrid access model that combines subscription content with options for open access publication for individual articles. This approach seeks to maximize readership among clinicians, researchers, and students while supporting researchers who require open access for their work. open access publishing model
The journal maintains indexing and discoverability through major bibliographic databases, and its articles often become reference points in subsequent reviews and clinical guidelines. PubMed DOI
Influence and reception
Endocrine Reviews is widely cited in the field of endocrinology, shaping how clinicians interpret new data and how researchers frame future inquiries. Its balance of mechanistic depth and clinical relevance helps bridge laboratory findings with patient outcomes. impact factor systematic review
By providing authoritative syntheses, the journal informs continuing medical education and supports evidence-informed decision-making in practice settings worldwide. continuing medical education clinical guidelines
Controversies and debates
As with any leading scientific publication, Endocrine Reviews operates in a landscape of competing viewpoints about how knowledge should be generated, interpreted, and shared. Debates include discussions about the influence of industry funding on review topics, the transparency of conflicts of interest, and how to manage potential biases in expert authorship. The journal maintains COI disclosures and editorial policies designed to mitigate undue influence while recognizing that collaboration with industry can drive important advances when properly managed. conflict of interest industry funding ethics in research
Open science and access policies are another axis of discussion. Proponents argue that broader access accelerates innovation and patient benefit, while skeptics worry about costs and sustainability. Endocrine Reviews’ hybrid model reflects an attempt to reconcile these aims by expanding access to readers who cannot pay while preserving the peer‑review system that underpins trust in the literature. open access scientific publishing
In the broader culture of science, some critics argue that certain debates are too quickly imported from political discourse into science policy and publication practices. From a traditionalist perspective, the priority remains rigorous methodology, replicable findings, and clinically meaningful conclusions, with the understanding that social debates should not dictate scientific standards. Critics of overpoliticization contend that clarity about evidence and patient outcomes should guide review topics and interpretation, rather than identity-driven narratives. Proponents of this view emphasize that well‑cut and well‑written reviews that focus on data, not rhetoric, best serve the public interest. evidence-based medicine policy debates clinical practice guidelines
Notable topics and themes
Endocrine signaling and regulation: Reviews in this area summarize hormone synthesis, release, receptor signaling, and cross‑talk between endocrine axes. Readers gain insight into how disruptions in signaling contribute to disease and how targeted therapies can restore balance. hormone signal transduction receptor signaling
Metabolic and energy homeostasis: From insulin action to adipose tissue biology, reviews in metabolism inform clinical management of obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, translating basic physiology into therapeutic strategies. diabetes mellitus metabolism adipose tissue
Thyroid and pituitary disorders: Comprehensive assessments of thyroid function, autoimmune thyroid disease, pituitary tumors, and related endocrine disorders help clinicians diagnose and treat complex presentations. thyroid gland pituitary gland hypothalamus
Adrenal and gonadal health: Reviews cover adrenal insufficiency, Cushing’s syndrome, gonadal disorders, and hormone replacement strategies, integrating pathophysiology with practical management. adrenal cortex gonads hormone replacement therapy
Reproductive endocrinology and neuroendocrinology: Topics include fertility, puberty, menstrual disorders, and brain–endocrine interactions that influence behavior and physiology. reproductive endocrinology neuroendocrinology
Endocrine disruptors and environmental health: Longstanding discussions address how exogenous chemicals affect hormonal systems, with implications for public health and regulatory science. endocrine disruptors environmental health
Translational and clinical impact: Across topics, Endocrine Reviews emphasizes how mechanistic insights translate into diagnostics, therapeutics, and guidelines that affect patient care. translational medicine clinical guidelines