Electromagnetic Field TensorEdit
The electromagnetic field tensor is a compact, covariant way to describe electric and magnetic fields in the language of relativity. It packages the familiar three-dimensional fields into a single object that lives on spacetime and transforms predictably under Lorentz transformations. This unification makes the structure of electromagnetism manifest in different reference frames and under different coordinate choices, without privileging any particular observer.
In four-dimensional spacetime, the electromagnetic field is represented by the antisymmetric rank-2 tensor Fμν. It can be derived from the four-potential Aμ through Fμν = ∂μAν − ∂νAμ, a relation that encodes both the electric field and the magnetic field in a way that respects gauge symmetry. In a given inertial frame, the spatial components of Fμν correspond to the magnetic field, while the mixed components contain the electric field. This arrangement allows Maxwell's equations to be written in a compact, coordinate-free form, emphasizing the geometric nature of electromagnetism.
Two Lorentz invariants built from the field tensor organize the theory in a frame-independent way. The first invariant, constructed from FμνFμν, is related to the difference between magnetic and electric energy densities, depending on the metric signature used. The second invariant, built from the dual tensor *Fμν (the Hodge dual of F), is proportional to E·B. These invariants remain unchanged under Lorentz transformations, providing a convenient diagnostic for the electromagnetic field that does not depend on a particular viewpoint. The dual tensor *Fμν is defined by contracting F with the Levi-Civita symbol and encodes the complementary information about the fields.
Maxwell’s equations take a particularly elegant form when written in tensor language. In the absence of charges and currents, they reduce to the two concise statements ∂μFμν = 0 and ∂[αFβγ] = 0, where the brackets denote antisymmetrization. With sources, the equations become ∂μFμν = μ0Jν, linking the field to its sources Jν. The second set, ∂[αFβγ] = 0, expresses the homogeneous relations that follow from the definition of Fμν in terms of the potential. Together, these equations reproduce the full content of the familiar curl and divergence equations of classical electromagnetism but within a fully relativistic framework. The calculus language here connects to the idea of differential forms, with F as a 2-form and Maxwell’s equations as statements about exterior derivatives.
The energy and momentum carried by the electromagnetic field are described by the electromagnetic stress-energy tensor, TμνEM, which couples to gravity in general relativity and to matter in flat spacetime. In vacuum, one common expression (in a particular convention) is TμνEM = (1/μ0)[FμαFν α − (1/4)ημνFαβFαβ], where ημν is the spacetime metric. This tensor provides the densities and fluxes of energy and momentum, including the Poynting vector as the energy flux and the Maxwell stress components as momentum flux. In curved spacetime, the field remains a 2-form, and the stress-energy tensor acts as a source in the Einstein field equations, TμνEM contributing to the curvature of spacetime alongside matter and other fields.
The geometric formulation extends naturally to curved spacetime and to situations involving media. In general relativity, Fμν remains a two-form, and Maxwell’s equations generalize to ∇μFμν = μ0Jν and ∇[αFβγ] = 0, where ∇μ is the covariant derivative compatible with the metric. The coupling to gravity occurs through the total stress-energy tensor, which includes TμνEM alongside matter contributions. In media, constitutive relations connect Fμν to the excitation fields, leading to a richer set of equations that describe how materials respond to electromagnetic fields. Discussions of constitutive relations and their tensorial incarnations often appear in the context of constitutive relations and electromagnetic media.
Historical formulations and debates surrounding the momentum and energy of the electromagnetic field in materials have long featured in the literature. A notable controversy concerns the correct expression for the momentum of light in a dielectric, historically framed as the Abraham versus Minkowski dispute. Each tensorial approach emphasizes different physical aspects: Minkowski’s framework often emphasizes the field’s momentum density, while Abraham’s emphasizes the momentum transfer to matter. Modern treatments understand that the total, observable momentum in a system—field plus matter—must be considered, and the two descriptions can be reconciled within a consistent framework by accounting for the exchange of momentum between fields and media. This debate is a classic example of how careful accounting of energy and momentum in relativistic field theories in media can influence interpretation, while the underlying equations remain consistent with experimental results in the appropriate limits. See for example discussions of the Abraham momentum and the Minkowski momentum in dielectric media.
Beyond vacuum, the tensor formulation clarifies how electromagnetic fields propagate and interact with matter. The invariants guide the classification of field configurations, including plane waves, wave packets, and more complex structures like guided modes in waveguides. The tensor approach also makes the gauge freedom explicit: the physics depends only on Fμν, which is invariant under transformations Aμ → Aμ + ∂μΛ for any scalar function Λ, even though the potential itself is not uniquely determined. This gauge invariance underpins many practical techniques in electromagnetism, such as choosing convenient gauges to simplify problems or to highlight particular symmetries.
In a broader theoretical context, Fμν participates in the language of differential geometry. It is the curvature-like object associated with the electromagnetic potential and, as a 2-form, naturally integrates over surfaces in spacetime. The formalism aligns with the treatment of other gauge fields described by fiber bundles, where the potential Aμ plays the role of a connection and Fμν represents the field strength. The geometric perspective emphasizes that electromagnetism is not tied to a single coordinate system or a single splitting of space and time, but rather is a feature of the geometry of spacetime itself.
Subheaders
Definition and basic properties
- The antisymmetry Fμν = −Fνμ encodes the fact that the electric and magnetic fields are not independent ingredients but components of a single spacetime field.
- The components in a given frame reveal the familiar E and B fields, with the correspondence governed by the chosen metric signature and basis.
Lorentz covariance and transformation
- Fμν transforms according to the adjoint representation of the Lorentz group, ensuring that physical predictions do not depend on the observer.
- The tensor form reveals how E and B mix under boosts and rotations, a feature that is central to relativistic electromagnetism.
Invariants and duality
- The two independent invariants constructed from Fμν and its dual *Fμν provide a frame-independent fingerprint of the field configuration.
- The dual tensor, derived via the Levi-Civita symbol, plays a key role in expressing magnetic and electric relationships in a symmetric way.
Field equations in tensor form
- Maxwell’s equations appear compactly in terms of Fμν and its derivatives, with sources Jμ entering through a four-current.
- The potential formulation and gauge invariance are natural consequences of this tensorial approach.
Extensions to media and gravity
- Constitutive relations connect Fμν to the excitations in matter, shaping how the field interacts with materials.
- In general relativity, the coupling to gravity proceeds through the stress-energy tensor, linking electromagnetism to spacetime curvature.