Contents

Eip 2981Edit

EIP-2981, known as the NFT Royalty Standard, is an Ethereum Improvement Proposal that seeks to standardize how royalties are calculated and reported for secondary sales of Non-fungible token on the Ethereum blockchain. The goal is to reduce fragmentation across marketplaces and wallets, so creators can reliably receive royalties regardless of where their tokens are traded. By defining a single interface, EIP-2981 makes it easier for marketplaces such as OpenSea and others to implement automatic royalty payments and for buyers to understand the ongoing cost structure of a token.

The proposal emerged from practical concerns in the rapidly growing NFT ecosystem, where creators often relied on inconsistent, platform-specific royalty agreements. Before EIP-2981, secondary-market royalties could vary widely from one marketplace to another, creating uncertainty for creators and complicating efforts to monetize a work over time. EIP-2981 provides a predictable mechanism that many major marketplaces can adopt, contributing to a more interoperable and creator-friendly market.

Technical overview

  • The core element of EIP-2981 is the royaltyInfo function, with a signature roughly described as royaltyInfo(uint256 _tokenId, uint256 _salePrice) external view returns (address receiver, uint256 royaltyAmount). This function returns the address that should receive royalties and the amount to be paid given a particular sale price.
  • Implementation is optional for a given contract, but once a contract adopts the standard, marketplaces and wallets can rely on a consistent calculation of royalties for any tokenId.
  • Royalty data can be defined on a per-token basis or, in some designs, per-collection, enabling flexible royalty schemas. The contract that implements EIP-2981 typically stores a mapping from tokenId to (receiver, basis points or amount) and uses _salePrice to compute royalties at sale time.
  • The standard is designed to be compatible with the common NFT standards such as ERC-721 and ERC-1155 and can be integrated into contracts that implement those interfaces. When a sale occurs on a compliant marketplace, the platform can query royaltyInfo to determine how much to pay and to whom.
  • It is important to note that EIP-2981 does not automatically transfer funds; it provides the information needed for a marketplace to route payments. Actual payment flows depend on the marketplace’s contractual logic and the user’s transaction, as with other on-chain financial interactions.
  • Adoption hinges on interoperability: if a token implements EIP-2981, any compliant marketplace or wallet can query the royaltyInfo data and apply the royalty during settlement, reducing the need for bespoke integration with each platform.

Adoption and ecosystem impact

  • A growing set of NFT projects and marketplaces have implemented or supported EIP-2981, contributing to a more predictable and scalable royalty regime across the ecosystem. On Ethereum, notable platforms such as OpenSea have engaged with royalty standards to facilitate automatic royalty payments.
  • By providing a common interface, EIP-2981 helps creators plan long-term revenue, while marketplaces can offer standardized features that attract both artists and collectors. This has implications for monetization models, creator protections, and the economics of digital art and collectibles.
  • The standard can interact with governance and licensing decisions around tokens, but it remains a technical specification that governs how royalty data is exposed and consumed rather than prescribing specific royalty rates or terms.

Criticisms and debates

  • Coverage and enforcement: While EIP-2981 standardizes the interface, actual royalties still depend on how marketplaces implement payment flows. Some platforms may ignore or selectively apply royalties, especially in markets that emphasize zero-fee trading or rapid secondary sales. Critics argue that on-chain standards need robust enforcement or incentives to ensure consistent royalty payments.
  • Per-token vs per-collection royalties: Different projects prefer different royalty models. Per-token royalties allow precise compensation for individual works, but this can complicate contract design and increase maintenance overhead. Per-collection royalties simplify administration but may under- or over-compensate specific creators. Debates focus on which approach best aligns incentives for artists, platforms, and buyers.
  • Impact on liquidity and market dynamics: Royalty schemes can influence trading behavior. Some buyers and marketplaces view royalties as a friction cost that reduces liquidity or attractiveness of certain tokens, while defenders see royalties as essential to sustaining creators in a digital economy. The balance between encouraging creation and maintaining efficient markets is a central theme in these discussions.
  • Legal and cross-jurisdictional considerations: As with many digital-asset standards, royalties intersect with intellectual property rights and contractual law. Critics warn that on-chain royalties may not fully capture offline licensing or rights-holding realities, while supporters view on-chain standards as a practical mechanism for ensuring compensation in a fast-moving digital market.
  • The role of “woke” or progressive critiques: In the broader conversation around digital economies and creator compensation, some critics argue for stronger protections for artists and claim current market structures under-protect creators. Proponents of the standard often emphasize engineering practicality and market-driven mechanisms, arguing that broad adoption and interoperability are the most effective paths to stable creator revenue. In this technical context, the focus remains on interoperability, clarity, and predictable economics rather than policy-driven narratives.

Implementation considerations

  • Developers implementing NFT contracts can add EIP-2981 support by exposing the royaltyInfo function and wiring it to their chosen royalty scheme. This involves careful design of how token IDs map to receivers and royalty rates, as well as compatibility with existing interfaces like ERC-721 and ERC-1155.
  • Marketplaces integrating EIP-2981 must query royaltyInfo for a given token and sale price and ensure that the computed royaltyAmount is paid to the correct receiver. This creates a more uniform experience for buyers who expect royalties to be honored across platforms.
  • Developers should document any deviations or exceptions, such as opt-out provisions or token-specific carve-outs, to manage expectations among collectors and rights holders.

See also