Contents

Concurrency ControlEdit

Concurrency control is the set of techniques and mechanisms that coordinate the execution of multiple operations that access shared data, ensuring correctness while enabling parallelism. In computing, this discipline is central to transaction (computing) systems, database management systems, and distributed systems, where concurrent reads and writes must not corrupt data or violate logical consistency. The core objective is to deliver outcomes equivalent to some serial order of operations, a property known as serializability, while allowing as much concurrency as possible. The field also covers aspects of recovery, durability, and performance, all of which are crucial in production environments where uptime and data integrity matter.

From a practical, outcomes-oriented perspective, the best concurrency-control strategies are those that balance safety guarantees with predictable performance under real workloads. That balance often pits pessimistic approaches, which assume conflicts will happen and therefore enforce strict ordering via locking, against optimistic approaches, which assume conflicts are rare and validate correctness after the fact. The choice depends on data access patterns, contention levels, and the hardware environment, including memory models, cache coherence and storage technologies. The ongoing evolution of hardware—such as non-volatile memory and processors with strong parallelism—also influences which techniques scale best in practice. The discussion frequently intersects with discussions of data integrity, durability, and the economics of system design, since reliability and speed both matter to users and providers of software services.

Core concepts

  • Goals and correctness: Concurrency control aims to preserve data integrity and to enforce a consistent view of shared data across concurrent tasks. The fundamental correctness criterion is often expressed in terms of serializability and related concepts such as isolation (computing) and durability when coupled with recovery. The broad umbrella includes the four ACID properties: Atomicity; Consistency (computer science); Isolation (computing); and Durability.

  • Isolation levels: Systems expose varying isolation levels, trading off strictness for performance. Higher isolation reduces anomalies but can restrict concurrency; lower isolation increases potential anomalies but improves throughput. These choices interact with hardware features and distributed environments, where latency and failure modes differ from single-node settings. See isolation level for the spectrum from strict serializability to weaker models.

  • Locks and synchronization: A large portion of traditional concurrency-control research centers on Lock (computer science) mechanisms and Two-phase locking variants. Locks can be shared (read) or exclusive (write), and their management aims to prevent conflicting accesses. Common problems include Deadlock and, in some designs, Livelock. Lock granularity, from coarse-grained to fine-grained, affects contention and performance.

  • Versioning and alternative approaches: Versioned data provides a way to execute concurrently without blocking readers from writers as aggressively. Multiversion concurrency control (MVCC) and related techniques enable readers to access old versions while writers update new ones, reducing blocking and improving throughput in many workloads. Optimistic concurrency control assumes conflicts are rare and validates correctness at commit time, while Pessimistic concurrency control relies on blocking to prevent conflicts upfront.

  • Timestamp-based and ordering strategies: Strategies such as Timestamp ordering assign logical clocks to transactions and enforce a global order, which can simplify reasoning about correctness but may reduce concurrency under contention.

  • Recovery and durability: Write-ahead logging and other recovery mechanisms are intertwined with concurrency control, ensuring that after a crash, the system can restore a consistent state without violating prior correctness guarantees. This links to broader topics of Distributed database reliability and ACID-compliant operation.

  • Distributed and cross-node coordination: In distributed systems, concurrency control must contend with network latency, partial failures, and clock synchronization issues. Protocols such as Two-phase commit for distributed transactions and the broader trade-offs highlighted by the CAP theorem shape how systems balance consistency, availability, and partition tolerance.

Techniques and algorithms

  • Lock-based approaches: This family emphasizes acquiring and releasing locks to protect shared data. Techniques include Strict two-phase locking and other variants designed to ensure that a transaction's access is well-ordered and that conflicts are avoided at the cost of potential waiting and deadlock risks. Lock-based systems tend to be intuitive and predictable but can suffer under high contention.

  • Optimistic concurrency control: In this model, transactions proceed without locking and validate their legality at commit time. If conflicts are detected, some transactions are rolled back and retried. This approach works well when conflicts are infrequent or expensive locking would thwart parallelism.

  • Timestamp ordering: Transactions receive monotonically increasing timestamps that determine the version of data they are allowed to read or write. Conflicts resolve by aborting or reordering transactions to maintain a global, serializable order.

  • Multiversion concurrency control (MVCC): By keeping multiple versions of data, MVCC allows readers to access consistent snapshots without blocking writers, reducing contention and often improving throughput for read-heavy workloads. Writers create new versions while readers continue with older ones, and garbage collection removes obsolete versions over time.

  • Distributed concurrency control: When data is distributed, coordinating access across nodes becomes essential. Two-phase commit and related consensus-based techniques are used to ensure that distributed transactions either commit or abort atomically, preserving global consistency in the face of failures.

  • Recovery-aware design: Systems integrate concurrency control with durability and crash-recovery plans to ensure that the system can recover to a consistent state after a failure, without violating the invariants established during normal operation.

Performance, reliability, and trade-offs

  • Contention and scalability: The choice of concurrency-control strategy depends heavily on workload characteristics. Read-heavy workloads may benefit from MVCC, while write-heavy workloads might rely on optimized locking or partitioned data access to reduce contention.

  • Granularity and locality: Finer-grained locking or versioning can improve concurrency but increases management overhead and the potential for fragmentation and complexity. Coarser granularity simplifies coordination but can serialize more work than necessary.

  • Real-time and deterministic requirements: Systems with hard real-time constraints emphasize predictable latency and bounded worst-case behavior, which can constrain the design of concurrency-control mechanisms and favor deterministic scheduling approaches.

  • Open vs. closed ecosystems: The broader ecosystem around a concurrency-control approach matters. Widely used, well-documented strategies with proven production track records tend to attract more community and vendor support, which in turn fuels reliability and interoperability across platforms like database management systems and distributed databases.

History and impact

Concurrency control has evolved from early, monolithic database systems toward a diverse toolkit that spans traditional Relational database management systems as well as modern NoSQL and in-memory stores. Early work established the formal foundations for correctness under concurrent access, while later developments introduced MVCC to reduce blocking in read-dominant workloads. The distributed era brought new challenges, with protocols like 2PC and advances in consensus algorithms shaping how multinational organizations guarantee data consistency across data centers. The ongoing tension between strict correctness guarantees and pragmatic performance continues to drive research and engineering decisions in both academia and industry, reflecting the bottom-line priority of delivering reliable systems that behave predictably under load.

See also