Contents

Combined Defence ServicesEdit

Combined Defence Services (CDS) is the centralized entry pathway used by the Indian government to commission officers into the three services—the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force—as well as to recruit for the Officers Training Academy (OTA). Conducted twice yearly by the Union Public Service Commission (Union Public Service Commission), CDS brings graduates from diverse backgrounds into a professional, merit-based officer corps. It stands apart from the National Defence Academy route, which selects candidates before service-specific training begins, by funneling directly into service-specific academies after graduation.

CDS serves as a key instrument of national security policy in how it consolidates officer recruitment into a single, transparent process. Proponents argue that a common-entry examination promotes standardization, reduces duplication, and yields leaders who can operate with cross-service coordination in the field. In practice, CDS candidates move on to training at the service academies, where they are ultimately commissioned into the Indian Army, Indian Navy, Indian Air Force, or Officer Training Academy for non-technical entries and, in some cases, specific paths within the services. The exam, therefore, plays a central role in shaping the officer corps that sustains India’s defense posture across decades.

History and context

The CDS framework emerged in the mid-20th century as part of a broader effort to professionalize and unify officer recruitment across India’s armed forces. Prior to CDS, appointments to the officer ranks were conducted through separate, service-specific channels. The establishment of a common examination under the aegis of the Union Public Service Commission aimed to raise standards, foster interoperability among the services, and streamline selection for a diverse pool of graduates. Over time, the CDS process has evolved, adjusting patterns, eligibility rules, and the balance of service allocations to reflect changing defense needs and governmental priorities. For more on the broader governance of examinations and appointments, see the Union Public Service Commission.

Structure of the examination and selection

CDS consists of a written stage followed by a testing stage conducted by the Services Selection Board (Services Selection Board). The written examination is tailored to designate candidates for different academies:

  • For the Indian Military Academy (Indian Military Academy), the Indian Naval Academy (Indian Naval Academy), and the Air Force Academy, the written paper set typically includes three subjects: English, General Knowledge, and Elementary Mathematics.
  • For the Officers Training Academy (Officer Training Academy (non-technical entries and, in recent years, increased participation of women in some streams)), the written examination generally comprises two papers: English and General Knowledge.

Candidates who clear the written tests are summoned for the SSB interview, a comprehensive, multi-day assessment of personality, leadership potential, and suitability for commission. The SSB process includes psychological tests, group tasks, and personal interviews designed to gauge decision-making, teamwork, and officer-like qualities. A medical examination by the military medical authorities follows, establishing fitness for training and service. Final merit is determined by UPSC based on performance in the written examination and the SSB process.

Key training pathways after selection lead to commissioning at the respective academies:

For those following the OTA route, commissioning typically yields eligibility for short-service or permanent-service patterns depending on service needs, performance, and policy developments. See also discussions around joint-service leadership and the role of the academy system in professional development within the armed forces.

Eligibility and selection criteria

Eligibility for CDS is set by the UPSC and reflects a balance between age, education, and physical readiness. The general framework includes:

  • Education: Graduation from a recognized university. This makes CDS a pathway for graduates to enter service academies directly after completing higher education.
  • Age: Different age bands apply depending on the academy. In broad terms, candidates for IMA, INA, and AFA fall into a younger bracket, while OTA accepts a slightly broader window. Exact limits are published in the UPSC CDS notification and are subject to periodic revision.
  • Nationality and residence: Candidates are typically Indian citizens with allowances for certain categories of applicants under special provisions, as stipulated by the government and UPSC guidelines.
  • Physical and medical standards: Candidates must meet fitness and medical criteria appropriate to military service, as verified by a medical board during the selection process.
  • Other criteria: Unmarried status has traditionally been a criterion for some entry routes, though policy specifics can vary over time and by service.

Successful candidates undergo training at the service academies and emerge as commissioned officers with a service-specific career trajectory ahead of them. See Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Air Force for details on branches and career development.

Training and careers after CDS

Training at the service academies is designed to shape not only technical competence but also leadership, adaptability, and the ability to operate in joint and inter-service contexts. Graduates are commissioned into their respective branches and begin careers that may include staff appointments, command roles, and operational assignments across peacetime and wartime contexts. Over the years, the officer corps has emphasized professional development, advanced education, and the capacity to operate in a networked defense environment. See Military education and the pages for the individual services for deeper coverage of posts, promotions, and career tracks.

Controversies and debates

As with many national recruitment programs, CDS has faced debates rooted in concerns about standards, eligibility, and the evolving needs of a modern defense force. From a traditional emphasis on merit and readiness, several topics have generated public discussion:

  • Gender integration and combat roles: Debates center on whether entrance and training standards should be identical across sexes and whether all arms should be opened to women. Proponents argue for equal opportunity and the efficient use of available Talent, while critics emphasize maintaining the highest standards for physically demanding streams and the operational requirements of frontline units. Over time, policy shifts have expanded roles for women in many branches, and discussions continue about the scope and pace of permanent commission opportunities and battlefield assignment.
  • Jointness and service culture: CDS is sometimes defended as a practical path toward greater jointness and interoperability among the three services. Critics worry that service-specific traditions and career structures could be diluted by a common-entry model, though supporters view cross-service experience as strengthening overall defense effectiveness.
  • Resource allocation and training costs: The cost of training officers—who are expensive to educate and sustain over long careers—remains a point of interest for policymakers and observers. Advocates argue that a merit-based system justifies the investment, given the returns in leadership, strategic thinking, and national security capabilities.
  • Race, caste, and socio-economic considerations: India’s broader public‑policy debates about representation and opportunity influence discussions around entry standards and the inclusivity of the officer corps. Proponents of a merit-centric model contend that CDS should prioritize capability and national interest, while critics may call for broader outreach or support mechanisms to widen participation without compromising the core requirements of service readiness.

These debates reflect the tension between preserving high performance standards and adapting to a changing security environment. They are often framed in terms of maintaining deterrence and national resilience while expanding opportunity within the armed forces.

See also