Contents

ChoregrapheEdit

Choregraphe is the graphical programming environment that teams up with the NAOqi framework to program and control SoftBank Robotics’ humanoid robots, notably the NAO and Pepper lines. It provides a visual, drag-and-drop approach to building behaviors, allowing operators to choreograph motion, speech, perception, and interaction without writing extensive code from scratch. While it sits in the realm of research and education, its practical impact extends into customer service, demonstrations, and early-stage robotics development. The tool is part of a broader ecosystem that includes the NAOqi software stack and a suite of hardware platforms designed for interactive, human-facing robots.

Choregraphe has become a key bridge between non-programmers, educators, and professional robotics developers who want to prototype and deploy interactive robot behaviors quickly. By supporting a box-and-arrow workflow, it lowers the barrier to entry for programming complex sequences of actions, gestures, and dialogue, while still offering access to underlying scripting when deeper customization is required. The platform is often discussed alongside other robotics software ecosystems, including ROS and vendor-specific toolchains, as a way to implement practical, repeatable robot behaviors for controlled environments. See Pepper (robot) and NAO (robot) for examples of hardware that commonly rely on Choregraphe as part of their development workflow.

Overview

  • Visual programming paradigm: Choregraphe uses a collection of boxes (modules) that represent actions or sensors. Users connect these boxes to form workflows that determine a robot’s sequence of movements, speech, and responses. This approach is designed to be intuitive for designers and educators, enabling rapid exploration of interactive scenarios.

  • Integration with NAOqi modules: The tool interfaces with a rich set of robot services, such as ALMotion for movement, ALTextToSpeech for spoken output, and ALMemory for perception and state. This integration makes it possible to assemble complex behaviors by wiring together higher-level actions rather than writing low-level motor code.

  • 3D simulation and testing: Choregraphe typically includes a simulation environment that lets developers test behaviors before deploying them to a real robot. This reduces risk and accelerates iteration, especially in classroom or showroom settings.

  • Export and deployment: Behavioral designs created in Choregraphe can be exported for execution on the robot’s NAOqi-based system, or extended with Python scripting for more advanced control. This offers a path from rapid prototyping to production-style demonstrations.

  • Cross-platform considerations: The software has been used on various desktop operating systems, reflecting SoftBank Robotics’ emphasis on accessibility for educators, researchers, and developers. The core idea remains: make robot programming approachable without sacrificing the option to go deeper when needed.

  • Terminology and ecosystems: Choregraphe sits within the broader NAOqi ecosystem and is part of the competitive landscape of humanoid-robot programming tools. For a sense of the industry context, consider SoftBank Robotics’s broader product line and the competing toolchains available for modern service robots.

History and development

Choregraphe emerged as part of the effort to bring programmable humanoid robots into classrooms, labs, and customer-facing environments. It grew in tandem with the NAOqi software stack developed by Aldebaran Robotics, the Paris-based company that pioneered NAO and later Pepper. After SoftBank acquired Aldebaran, the platform continued to evolve under SoftBank Robotics, maintaining a focus on ease of use for non-specialist developers while keeping hooks to more advanced software through NAOqi and its modules.

The relationship between Choregraphe and hardware is emblematic of the era’s push to commercialize humanoid robotics for service contexts. Pepper, designed for retail and customer interaction, benefited from a programming environment that could be taught quickly to staff and students, enabling hands-on demonstrations of conversational capabilities and gesture-based communication. The ongoing development of Choregraphe reflects a broader strategy of combining visual programming with access to powerful robot services, striking a balance between accessibility and depth.

Features and capabilities

  • Box-based workflow design: Users construct sequences and state machines by arranging action boxes and control-flow connectors, enabling scenarios such as greeting customers, guiding them through product catalogs, or delivering scripted information.

  • Motion and gesture control: Through modules like ALMotion and related components, Choregraphe enables a range of naturalistic movements, postures, and gestures that accompany speech and interactions.

  • Speech and dialogue: ALTextToSpeech lets robots speak with controlled intonation and phrasing, while scripting can drive conversational logic and context-aware responses.

  • Perception and sensors: Interfaces to vision, sound, and tactile inputs allow robots to respond to environmental cues, recognize faces, or react to user interactions. This is typically handled via NAOqi modules such as ALMemory and vision components.

  • Python extensibility: For more advanced users, Python blocks or scripted modules let developers implement custom logic, algorithms, or data handling beyond what is achievable with standard boxes alone.

  • Simulation as a development aid: The included 3D simulation environment enables rapid testing of motion, timing, and interaction flows before committing to hardware.

  • Deployment pipelines: Behaviors created in Choregraphe can be exported and deployed to compatible robots, supporting straightforward transfer from prototype to live demonstrations.

Use cases and deployments

  • Education and research: Schools and universities use Choregraphe to teach robotics concepts, human-robot interaction, and programming fundamentals, leveraging the visual interface to demonstrate ideas quickly.

  • Retail and customer service: Pepper’s design goals align with service-oriented tasks, and Choregraphe-supported behaviors help operators stage dialogues, product explanations, and interactive demonstrations in a controlled setting.

  • Prototyping and product demonstrations: Developers use the tool to prototype interaction paradigms, test user experiences, and create demonstrators for conferences or pilots.

  • Open standards and ecosystem considerations: The platform sits in a landscape where practitioners evaluate openness, reusability, and scalability. Some in the field advocate for broader interoperability with open standards, both to reduce vendor lock-in and to accelerate innovation across hardware and software stacks.

Controversies and debates

  • Job displacement and productivity: A common debate around humanoid robots in service contexts centers on potential displacement of human workers. A right-of-center perspective often emphasizes that automation tends to reallocate labor toward higher-skill tasks and that productivity gains justify investments, while supporting retraining and wage-subsidy policies that help workers transition.

  • Data privacy and surveillance: As robots collect audio, video, and sensor data in public and semi-public spaces, concerns about how data is stored, used, and shared arise. The prudent stance emphasizes robust privacy protections, clear data-management policies, and portability of data, while keeping incentives for businesses to deploy helpful, customer-facing automation.

  • Vendor lock-in and interoperability: Critics sometimes argue that proprietary ecosystems like NAOqi and Choregraphe can entrench a single vendor’s control, limiting choice for schools and developers. Supporters contend that a stable, well-documented platform accelerates learning and deployment, while acknowledging the value of open standards and healthy competition—hence the interest in compatibility with open ecosystems such as ROS or other open robotics frameworks.

  • Realistic capability and hype: Some critics point to Pepper and similar robots as over-promised in how deeply they understand humans or how reliably they function in real-world settings. The pragmatic view accepts current limits while applauding incremental improvements in natural interaction, safety, and reliability, and focuses on responsible marketing and clear expectations about what the technology can do.

  • Cultural and ethical considerations: Discussions about how humanoid robots convey emotion or mimic human behavior often surface cultural assumptions and questions about the appropriate role of machines in social spaces. A centrist or market-oriented stance emphasizes the practical value of interaction design and the importance of aligning robot capabilities with legitimate human-robot collaboration goals, rather than elevating identity-based critiques at the expense of consumer utility.

See also